Complex Discovery | Recent | Elsewhere | Search |
fancy

2008 Chief Legal Officer Survey

30 06 2008

2008 Chief Legal Officer Survey By Altman Weil, Inc.
The Opinions of Chief Legal Officers on Issues of Importance
For the ninth year in a row, Altman Weil, Inc. has surveyed Chief Legal Officers (CLOs) in issues of importance in managing their corporate law departments. The purpose of these surveys is to:
1) Capture current thinking of Chief […]

categories Published under: Collect, General, Process, Produce, Review
read the full article



Provided by technology enthusiast Rob Robinson, Complex Discovery contains information, tools, and tactics relevant to the growing electronic discovery market. Nothing is ever as simple as it seems - and with that in mind - hopefully the content provided on this site and via the corresponding blog will help you as you translate complex discovery into executional simplicity.






fancy

So What About Voice Mail?

15 05 2008

By Greg Buckles via DCIG

The dreaded question plagues discovery vendors, IT and even industry experts shy away from tackling the costs and complexities created by emerging unified communications systems. Office Communications Server 2007 and other communication systems feed divergent media streams into enterprise archives, corporate legal hold repositories and litigation collections. This ’simplification’ for the users actually poses serious challenges for search technologies that have traditionally focused exclusively on text.

Finding key terms and phrases buried inside of mountains of recorded phone conversations, voice mails and IM chats can devour discovery budgets and send counsel crying ‘undue burden’ to the court. There seem to be two dominant speech analytics methods: phonetic indexing (first brought to eDiscovery by Nexidia) and transcription or speech-to-text (long dominated by Autonomy’s engine which supports both methods). Phonetic search renders sound wave forms into simplified strings of phonemes that can be indexed and searched. This makes the technology effectively content agnostic, but makes it challenging to integrate with text based search. Speech-to-text has been the foundation for automated conceptual search and improvements in speaker recognition technologies have also increased the value in what was effectively raw dialogue.

Knowing that one can search digitized conversations, the next question is can users effectively search everything within the enterprise system from unified federated search? There is little doubt that the archiving systems are aggressively pursuing acquisitions, partnerships and development to enable ingestion and indexing of every conceivable data stream. All of them started with email back in the late 1990’s. For example, Symantec doesn’t have audio, but jumped ahead with early products to handle IM, file shares, Sharepoint through merger and acquisition.

Mergers inject complexity by requiring integration of technology, services and cultures. Having experienced the Symantec-Veritas integration first hand, it always surprises me to see pundits and bloggers jumping all over the expected personnel departures. Moreover, other restructurings that occur in the wake of big M&A moves. Instead of looking at who departed, which products are End-of-Lifed and which partners jump ship, I think that we should look at who stays, fundamental IP integrations and new solution offerings to get a better idea of where the new joint entity is headed.

For the complete article, click here.

categories Published under: Collect, General, Process


Leave a message or two

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website



XHTML: The following tags are allowed:

    <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please leave a comment