ARCHIVED CONTENT
You are viewing ARCHIVED CONTENT released online between 1 April 2010 and 24 August 2018 or content that has been selectively archived and is no longer active. Content in this archive is NOT UPDATED, and links may not function.By Michael Pitch
While there has not yet been a definitive higher court case related to the use of predictive coding or computer-assisted review as an appropriate method for culling electronic data in discovery, several courts have weighed in on the side of the technology’s time and cost savings in reducing the sheer number of documents attorneys must review before producing them to the opposing party. This paper, authored by New York attorney Michael Pitch of TrustPoint International, contains a summary of nine major cases in which judges have held hearings on the use of predictive coding.
Read the original article at: trustpointintl.com