ARCHIVED CONTENT
You are viewing ARCHIVED CONTENT released online between 1 April 2010 and 24 August 2018 or content that has been selectively archived and is no longer active. Content in this archive is NOT UPDATED, and links may not function.By Gerard Britton
This is Part Two in a three-part article entitled, “Does the Uncritical Acceptance by Courts of Unsupported and Potentially Erroneous Technology Assisted Review Assertions Frustrate the Objectives of Discovery? 1 .” The article does not argue that traditional manual discovery is generally the most desirable method, or that technology-assisted review should be discarded. Manual review is often inefficient, even prohibitive, from a cost standpoint. Rather, the article challenges current judicial assessments and industry practices as lacking in either factual support or accurate conclusions, and asserts that judicial review of predictive coding should be structured differently than it currently is […]