Editor’s Note: Virginia is poised to become a key player in artificial intelligence (AI) regulation with the impending enactment of the Virginia High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act (HB 2094). This legislation represents a growing movement among U.S. states to establish frameworks governing AI’s impact on critical consumer-related decisions. If signed into law, HB 2094 would introduce stringent requirements for AI system developers and deployers, aiming to mitigate algorithmic discrimination and enhance transparency in sectors such as employment, finance, healthcare, and legal services. While the Act aligns with existing regulations in states like Colorado, it introduces unique compliance thresholds that could set a precedent for future AI governance. This article examines the scope, enforcement, implications, and criticisms of the proposed legislation, providing insight into its potential influence on AI oversight at both the state and national levels.


Content Assessment: AI Oversight in Virginia: Understanding the High-Risk AI Developer and Deployer Act

Information - 94%
Insight - 92%
Relevance - 92%
Objectivity - 93%
Authority - 91%

92%

Excellent

A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit expressed as a percentage of positive reception of the recent article from ComplexDiscovery OÜ titled, "AI Oversight in Virginia: Understanding the High-Risk AI Developer and Deployer Act."


Industry News – Artificial Intelligence Beat

AI Oversight in Virginia: Understanding the High-Risk AI Developer and Deployer Act

ComplexDiscovery Staff

Virginia stands on the cusp of establishing itself as a leader in the regulatory landscape governing high-risk artificial intelligence (AI) systems with the pending enactment of the Virginia High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Developer and Deployer Act (HB 2094). With the increasing deployment of AI in sectors that significantly impact consumers, Virginia’s approach reflects a growing trend of rigorous state-level AI oversight. The bill, passed by the Virginia legislature on February 20, 2025, positions Virginia as potentially the second U.S. state to implement comprehensive AI regulations, following Colorado’s AI legislation.

If Governor Glenn Youngkin signs HB 2094 into law, it will require AI system developers and deployers to adhere to stringent regulatory protocols to mitigate algorithmic discrimination and enhance transparency. High-risk AI systems, as defined by the Act, are those specifically intended to autonomously make or be a substantial factor in making consequential decisions that have a material legal or similarly significant effect on consumers in areas such as parole, education enrollment, employment opportunities, financial services, healthcare access, housing, insurance, marital status, or legal services. Importantly, these mandates exclude AI applications used in non-high-risk settings, such as systems performing narrow procedural tasks, improving previously completed human activities, anti-fraud technology without facial recognition, cybersecurity tools, and AI-enabled video games. Additionally, the bill does not apply to workers acting in a commercial or employment context, and there are broad exemptions for healthcare and insurance sectors.

The Act’s primary focus is on protecting consumers from prejudicial algorithmic decisions in vital areas of life. Developers must disclose risks, limitations, and intended purposes of high-risk AI systems, along with performance evaluation summaries and measures to mitigate algorithmic discrimination. Deployers must exercise a “reasonable duty of care” and implement risk management policies to prevent algorithmic discrimination. Compliance with established standards like NIST’s AI risk management frameworks or ISO/IEC 42001 is deemed sufficient to meet these requirements.

Similar to the Colorado Act, enforcement falls solely within the purview of the Virginia Attorney General, prohibiting private litigation. Non-compliance with HB 2094 can yield penalties ranging from $1,000 for minor violations to $10,000 for willful infractions, with a discretionary 45-day cure period. Each violation is considered separate, allowing penalties to accumulate quickly if multiple individuals are affected.

While Virginia’s prospective law aligns closely with Colorado’s existing framework, it presents crucial adaptations. Notably, it introduces a “principal basis” criterion, wherein AI influences must be the principal basis for consequential decisions to invoke compliance obligations—a stricter standard than Colorado’s “substantial factor” threshold.

Critically, discussions around Virginia’s legislative move surface broader societal implications, especially in transforming the modalities of employment practices. As AI continues to permeate hiring and operational aspects within firms, the fidelity of these technologies becomes paramount. Employers engaging with high-risk AI-driven hiring technologies must now integrate robust evaluative and oversight mechanisms. Transparency becomes imperative as decisions heavily augmented by AI necessitate disclosures to affected employees, providing opportunities for data correction and appeals against AI-induced determinations.

However, HB 2094 has faced criticism for containing loopholes that may allow companies to self-select out of compliance and for not fully addressing algorithmic discrimination. Despite these challenges, this legislative initiative signifies a broader national shift as more states pursue AI regulatory frameworks. As echoed by the impetus behind laws like the CAIA in Colorado, states are increasingly aligning regulatory directives to match the rapid pace of AI deployment. Even amidst differences, these varied legislative initiatives underscore a shared objective: ensuring AI technologies are both beneficial and equitable.

News Sources


Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ

 

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know, and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a highly recognized digital publication focused on providing detailed insights into the fields of cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery. Based in Estonia, a hub for digital innovation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ upholds rigorous standards in journalistic integrity, delivering nuanced analyses of global trends, technology advancements, and the eDiscovery sector. The publication expertly connects intricate legal technology issues with the broader narrative of international business and current events, offering its readership invaluable insights for informed decision-making.

For the latest in law, technology, and business, visit ComplexDiscovery.com.

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use

ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude, DALL-E2, Grammarly, Midjourney, and Perplexity, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).

ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on ComplexDiscovery.com. By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.