Content Assessment: Exercising the Right to be Forgotten? French Request their Data to be Delisted from Search Engines’ Results the Most

Information - 93%
Insight - 94%
Relevance - 90%
Objectivity - 91%
Authority - 92%

92%

Excellent

A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit of the recent post highlighting the results of the recent Surfshark study on the 'Right to Be Forgotten' in Europe.

Editor’s Note: From time to time, ComplexDiscovery highlights publicly available or privately purchasable announcements, content updates, and research from cyber, data, and legal discovery providers, research organizations, and ComplexDiscovery community members. While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions.

To submit recommendations for consideration and inclusion in ComplexDiscovery’s cyber, data, and legal discovery-centric service, product, or research announcements, contact us today.


Background Note: As online privacy concerns continue to rise, governments around the world are enacting laws to protect citizens’ fundamental right to data protection. In the EU and similar territories, people are now exercising their “right to be forgotten,” which allows them to request that organizations remove their personal data and search engines delist them from search results.

The “right to be forgotten” was first introduced in 2014 and was redefined as the “right to erasure” with the adoption of GDPR in 2018. The right applies to countries covered by GDPR, including the EU and EEA, and other European countries that have adopted similar laws, such as the UK and Switzerland.

The recent study on the right to be forgotten, presented by Surfshark, a privacy protection toolset developed to help its users control their online presence seamlessly, focuses specifically on the delisting of web pages for queries related to an individual’s name from European search engine result pages. It explores the extent to which this practice is becoming common and which countries exercise their “right to be forgotten” the most and least.

Press Announcement (February 28, 2023)*

French Request Their Data to be Delisted from Search Engines’ Results the Most

In total, Europeans submitted over 1 million “right to be forgotten” requests to Google and Microsoft Bing

Surfshark recently released a study analyzing the “right to be forgotten” requests. From 2015 to 2021, over 1 million requests were submitted to Google and Microsoft Bing, with half of the requests being from Western European countries. When the Covid-19 pandemic started, “right to be forgotten” cases rose by nearly 30% in 2020. Overall, French requests accounted for nearly a fourth of all submitted requests, while Estonia had the most requests per 10,000 people. Eastern European countries exercised their “right to erasure” the least.

The “right to be forgotten” allows individuals to ask web pages to delist queries related to their name from European search engine result pages. It applies to countries covered by GDPR (the EU and the EEA) and other European countries that have adopted similar laws, like the UK and Switzerland. Information about requesters within these web pages widely varies, from personal and professional information to connections with criminal activity. 

From 2015 to 2021, 1,066,274 “right to be forgotten” or “right to erasure” requests were submitted to Google and Bing. Of the two search engines, the vast majority (95.8%) of requests were delivered to Google. 2015 marked the first full year the policy had been in place, where 169.2k requests were submitted throughout the year. 


Right to be Forgotten over the Years

After 2015, “right to be forgotten” requests gradually decreased until 2020. Cases rose nearly 30% in 2020, totaling 161.3k. For example, Cyprus and Portugal submitted almost three times more requests in 2020 than the previous year. 2021 saw an additional 15% increase across the board, with an all-time high of 185.7k requests across the analyzed countries. 

“One of the reasons for the rise in the “right to be forgotten” requests in 2020 could be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. As many daily activities became virtual, it encouraged people to be more conscious of their digital hygiene and review their privacy online,” says Gabriele Kaveckyte, Privacy Counsel at Surfshark. “At the same time, GDPR enforcement accelerated and continues to enforce online privacy as a fundamental human right to this day.”

France submitted the most “right to be forgotten” requests between 2015 and 2021, with 255.6k requests accounting for nearly a fourth of all requests submitted over this period. 176.1k requests came from Germany, and 125.3k from the UK, with each country accounting for around 17% and 12% of the total, respectively. Requests submitted by these three countries comprise around half of all “right to be forgotten” requests submitted between 2015 and 2020. All other countries account for less than 10% of the total each.


Right to be Forgotten - Surfshark

Estonia leads in the “right to be forgotten” request density

Regarding request density (i.e., requests per 10k people), Estonia comes first with 53 requests per 10k people (more than 2.5 times higher than average). France takes the second position with 40, and the Netherlands takes third with 32 requests per 10k people. Bulgaria submitted the least requests per 10k people over the years, with around 6, over three times lower than the average of all the examined countries. 

Western and Northern Europe have the highest request density, with 28 and 21 requests per 10k people, respectively. Southern Europe issued 16 requests and Eastern Europe issued eight requests per 10k people.


Highest Density for Right to be Forgotten

1 in 10 “right to be forgotten” web page delisting requests are crime-related

4,009,729 web pages were included in the requests submitted to Google over 2015-2021. For Google, requesters asked to remove four web pages per request from its search results on average. Around half of the pages asked to be delisted from Google couldn’t be classed into a specific category, and nearly 17% fell under professional information (contained a requester’s work address, contact information, or general information about their business activities).


Right to be Forgotten Requests to Google

Around 1 in 10 web pages referenced the requester concerning crimes, including those within their professional field. Around 6% contained the requester’s personal information, such as their home address, residence, or other contact information, and images and videos of the individual.

METHODOLOGY

This study ranks 32 European countries that submitted “right to be forgotten” requests to Google and Microsoft Bing between 2015 and 2021. The two data sets are aggregated to calculate the total number of submitted requests and URLs specified per country and year. URLs defined within the “right to be forgotten” requests are unique web pages requested to delist from European search results. 

Read the original announcement.


*Shared with permission.

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery

 

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know, and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a highly recognized digital publication focused on providing detailed insights into the fields of cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery. Based in Estonia, a hub for digital innovation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ upholds rigorous standards in journalistic integrity, delivering nuanced analyses of global trends, technology advancements, and the eDiscovery sector. The publication expertly connects intricate legal technology issues with the broader narrative of international business and current events, offering its readership invaluable insights for informed decision-making.

For the latest in law, technology, and business, visit ComplexDiscovery.com.

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use

ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude, DALL-E2, Grammarly, Midjourney, and Perplexity, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).

ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on ComplexDiscovery.com. By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.