The Workstream of eDiscovery: Considering Processes and Tasks

The eDiscovery Processes and Tasks listing may be helpful in planning and consummating business and technology engagements related to the discipline of eDiscovery. The processes and tasks highlighted in the listing are not all-inclusive and represent only one of the myriads of approaches to eDiscovery.

en flag
nl flag
et flag
fi flag
fr flag
de flag
pt flag
ru flag
es flag

Draft Listing by ComplexDiscovery (Rob Robinson)

The Workstream of eDiscovery

From the trigger point for audits, investigations, and litigation to the conclusion of cases and matters with the defensible disposition of data, there are countless ways data discovery and legal discovery professionals approach and administer the discipline of eDiscovery.  Based on an aggregation of research from leading eDiscovery educators, developers, and providers, the following eDiscovery Processes and Tasks listing may be helpful as a planning tool for guiding business and technology discussions and decisions related to the conduct of eDiscovery projects. The processes and tasks highlighted in this listing are not all-inclusive and represent only one of the myriads of approaches to eDiscovery.


References:

  • Dimm, B. (2016). TAR 3.0 and Training of Predictive Coding Systems. [online] Cluster-text.com. Available at: http://www.cluster-text.com/v/TAR_3_and_training_predictive_coding.php [Accessed 25 February 202o].
  • Grossman, M. and Cormack, G. (2016). Continuous Active Learning for TAR. Practical Law, [online] (April/May). Available at: https://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~gvcormac/caldemo/AprMay16_EdiscoveryBulletin.pdf [Accessed 25 February 202o].
  • Haslam, A. (2019). eDisclosure Systems – Buyers Guide. 2019 ed. [ebook] Allvision Computing. Available at: https://complexdiscovery.com/the-edisclosure-systems-buyers-guide-2019-edition/ [Accessed 25 February 202o].
  • Losey, R. (2018). e-Discovery Team ®. [online] e-Discovery Team ®. Available at: https://e-discoveryteam.com/ [Accessed 12 May 2018].
  • Macauley, C. (2016). Forensic Matters: Further advances in TAR. [online] KordaMentha. Available at: https://www.kordamentha.com/News-and-Insights/Further-advances-in-TAR [Accessed 25 February 202o].
  • Socha, G. and Gelbmann, T. (2005). Electronic Discovery Reference Model. [online] Edrm.net. Available at: https://www.edrm.net/frameworks-and-standards/edrm-model/ [Accessed 25 February 2020].

Click here to recommend additions, adjustments, and/or updates.

Additional Reading:

ComplexDiscovery combines original industry research with curated expert articles to create an informational resource that helps legal, business, and information technology professionals better understand the business and practice of data discovery and legal discovery.

All contributions are invested to support the development and distribution of ComplexDiscovery content. Contributors can make as many article contributions as they like, but will not be asked to register and pay until their contribution reaches $5.