Editor’s Note: Democracy is increasingly shaped not by votes alone, but by code, algorithms, and opaque digital influence systems. In a compelling discussion at the 2025 Tallinn Digital Summit, European Commission Vice-President and High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas, in a fireside chat with CNN Global Affairs Analyst Kimberly Dozier, explored how the architecture of online platforms—and the AI that powers them—is quietly redefining democratic norms, trust, and accountability.

Her insights carry direct relevance for cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. From the manipulation of electoral discourse to the erosion of critical thinking through unchecked AI reliance, Kallas detailed a landscape where legal, compliance, and forensic frameworks must now evolve at algorithmic speed. Her call to modernize election monitoring and close regulatory enforcement gaps highlights the growing urgency to align digital evidence standards with emerging threats.

Importantly, Kallas did not issue a call to arms—but rather a call to collaborate. Her appeal to platform leaders and technologists to “join the white hat side” reflects a broader challenge to legal and risk professionals: to take a leading role in shaping transparent, accountable, and resilient digital ecosystems.

As digital manipulation becomes more sophisticated, the responsibility to safeguard institutional integrity and evidentiary trust will fall increasingly on those who understand both the law and the code. Kallas’s remarks are a timely blueprint for that work.


Content Assessment: Kaja Kallas Warns of Democracy's Algorithmic Drift at Tallinn Digital Summit

Information - 94%
Insight - 95%
Relevance - 95%
Objectivity - 94%
Authority - 96%

95%

Excellent

A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit expressed as a percentage of positive reception of the recent article from ComplexDiscovery OÜ titled, "Kaja Kallas Warns of Democracy's Algorithmic Drift at Tallinn Digital Summit."


Industry News – Artificial Intelligence Beat

Kaja Kallas Warns of Democracy’s Algorithmic Drift at Tallinn Digital Summit

ComplexDiscovery Staff

In a standout fireside chat on the second day of the 2025 Tallinn Digital Summit, held October 10 at the Estonian National Library, democracy’s fragility in the age of AI took center stage. European Commission Vice-President and High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas reflected on a sobering reality: democracy is increasingly shaped not just by legislation, but by the algorithms behind digital platforms.

In conversation with CNN’s Kimberly Dozier, Kallas unpacked how technology, once a beacon for democratization, has become a conduit for manipulation. Speaking from the newly refurbished Estonian National Library—a project she supported as Prime Minister—Kallas set the tone early: digital threats aren’t theoretical. They are already eroding public trust, the very foundation of democratic institutions.

“Technology is a human construct,” she reminded the audience. “The same goes for the laws that govern it. And if we don’t set the rules, others will.”



Kallas struck a balance between cautious optimism and strategic concern. She acknowledged that digital technologies have made governments more accessible and citizen engagement easier. But she also described how those same tools—particularly when powered by artificial intelligence—can polarize discourse and distort electoral processes.

She drew a striking analogy: just as physical labor has been offloaded to machines, cognitive reliance is now quietly shifting to algorithms. “If we start trusting AI too much—especially without questioning its sources—we risk weakening our ability to reason,” she said, noting that while AI brings efficiencies, it may also diminish critical thinking if used uncritically.

The conversation also touched on the growing power imbalance between governments and private tech platforms. Kallas noted that key decisions about what information gets amplified—or hidden—are increasingly made by platform boards rather than elected officials. “This undermines democratic accountability,” she said, emphasizing that decisions affecting public discourse should be guided by transparency and the public interest.



The geopolitical stakes are already apparent. Kallas described the European Union’s recent support for Moldova’s election infrastructure, which included deploying cybersecurity rapid-response teams to counter digital threats. More than 19,000 incidents of disinformation were detected, and over 100,000 TikTok accounts pushing Kremlin-aligned narratives were removed. “These are not minor operations,” she said. “This is digital warfare in real time.”

She also cited Poland as an example of perception manipulation. After Russian drones violated Polish airspace, conspiracy theories spread rapidly online. Within days, public opinion fractured: 30 percent believed the drones came from Ukraine, 25 percent blamed NATO, and 15 percent thought Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk was behind it. “That’s how fast perception can be weaponized,” Kallas warned.

When Dozier paused to clarify FIMI—Foreign Information Manipulation and Influence—it served as a reminder that even experienced professionals must stay current with the fast-evolving vocabulary of digital threats. Kallas acknowledged that while the EU has advanced tracking capabilities, enforcement is often uneven. Smaller countries frequently struggle to get platform cooperation because their markets or languages are not prioritized.



Current election monitoring methods, she added, are no longer adequate. “We need to change how we observe elections,” she said. “Most manipulation happens online. If we ignore that, we’re not seeing the full picture.” For legal technologists and compliance professionals, this points to a critical need: traditional auditing and forensic approaches must evolve to account for algorithmic and AI-driven influence.

Kallas also welcomed the European Democracy Shield—a new initiative introduced earlier at the summit by Commissioner Michael McGrath—as a step toward digital resilience. However, she noted that enforcement of existing regulations like the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act still faces knowledge gaps. “Regulators don’t always understand the tech well enough to see how algorithms work,” she said. “And that’s a problem.”

Drawing a contrast between global tech cultures, she said, “In Brussels, the verb is regulate. In Silicon Valley, it’s innovate. And in Washington, it’s litigate.” The line drew laughter, but underscored her point: democracies must align their values with their technological strategies if they hope to preserve institutional integrity.

As the conversation turned toward solutions, Kallas called for inclusive action. Rather than placing all responsibility on regulators, she appealed directly to platform leaders and technologists. “This is an invitation to join the white hat side,” she said, urging them to shape digital ecosystems that reinforce—not weaken—democratic structures.



Her closing thoughts returned to a theme that resonated throughout the summit: authoritarian regimes are actively using digital tools to divide and destabilize. Russia has mastered social manipulation, she noted, while China advances rapidly in surveillance technology. Though their methods differ, the objective is the same: to erode public trust in democratic systems.

Kallas recalled her time as Prime Minister, when conspiracy theories—once seen as fringe—began making their way into formal political discourse. “You think people won’t believe these things,” she said. “Then one day, it’s a parliamentary question.”

She ended with a challenge that was more contemplative than conclusive: If democracy is being shaped by algorithms, and AI increasingly determines what people see, think, and believe—how do we ensure those writing the code are accountable to the public interest?


News Sources

  • Rob Robinson, ComplexDiscovery. “Fireside Chat: Tech and Democracy: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.” Tallinn Digital Summit, Oct. 10, 2025, 1:15–1:45 p.m., Debate Stage. Featuring Kaja Kallas, Vice-President of the European Commission, and Kimberly Dozier, CNN.
  • Tallinn Digital Summit 2025

Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ

 

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know, and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a highly recognized digital publication focused on providing detailed insights into the fields of cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery. Based in Estonia, a hub for digital innovation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ upholds rigorous standards in journalistic integrity, delivering nuanced analyses of global trends, technology advancements, and the eDiscovery sector. The publication expertly connects intricate legal technology issues with the broader narrative of international business and current events, offering its readership invaluable insights for informed decision-making.

For the latest in law, technology, and business, visit ComplexDiscovery.com.

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use

ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude, Grammarly, Midjourney, and Perplexity, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).

ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on ComplexDiscovery.com. By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.