Thu. Mar 28th, 2024

Recently Cellebrite, a leader in the development of digital intelligence tools that provide access to data and automation of analysis for investigators, examiners, and agencies, published their 2019 report on industry trends for law enforcement. The report consisted of a survey of more than 2,700 global law enforcement professionals with the goal of understanding what types of digital data are being used in modern-day investigations and what role does technology play in resolving those investigations.

In 2017, global mobile devices and connections grew to 8.6 billion, and it is estimated that global mobile device traffic will reach almost one zettabyte annually by 2022 (1). These mobile-centric data points coupled with the fact that 85% of criminal investigations include some form of digital data (2) highlight the importance for data and legal discovery practitioners to have a working understanding of how the global law enforcement community considers digital data and devices in their investigative efforts. Provided below are selected extracts from the complete report from Cellebrite that may be beneficial for understanding, discussing, and addressing the challenges associated with data discovery on mobile devices.

Extract #1: Five Key Report Findings (3)

  • Mobile phones are the most frequently used and most important digital source for investigations.
  • The variety of digital sources used in investigations in increasing and now includes sources such as wearables and smart home technology being used more frequently in investigations.
  • Two most common challenges to extracting data from mobile phones are locked phones and encrypted data.
  • Law enforcement agencies are averaging three-month backlogs on investigations.
  • Despite the backlogs and the variety of digital sources and the amount of digital data that typically need to be reviewed in an investigation, the vast majority of law enforcement agencies are reviewing this information manually instead of using analytics solutions.

Extract #2: Most Frequently Reviewed Data Types in a Typical Investigation (4)

% Is a Combination of Very Frequent and Frequent Responses

  • Images from Digital Evidence – 94%
  • Text Message – 93%
  • Social Media – 92%
  • Videos from Digital Evidence – 90%
  • Contacts – 90%
  • Location History from Digital Evidence – 86%
  • Interviews (Witness, Victim, Suspect) – 72%
  • Documents and Files – 80%
  • Email – 78%
  • CCTV Videos – 68%
  • Data from Internal Police Databases – 64%
  • Digital Data from Other Cases – 64%
  • Crime Scene Photos – 59%
  • Audio from Digital Evidence – 59%
  • CDRs – 53%
  • Fingerprints – 40%
  • DNA Analysis – 40%
  • Ballistics – 24%
  • Blood Splatter Analysis – 18%

Although digital evidence cannot take the place of physical evidence, the results show it is an equally important source of information in many investigations.

Extract #3 How Data is Reviewed from Forensic Extractions for a Case (5)

  • Reader Tool – 69%
  • Digital Analytics and Link Relationship Tool (e.g., IBM i2, Palantir, Cellebrite Analytics, etc.) – 26%
  • Printed Extraction Report and Mark with Highlighter – 22%
  • Microsoft Excel – 19%
  • CDR Analysis Tool (e.g., Pen-Link, Hawk Analytics, ZetX, Chorus, etc.) – 17%
  • Other – 7%

The vast majority of investigators employ a “reader tool” to review data extracted from digital devices and sources.

Read and download the complete report at Cellebrite Annual Industry Trend Survey 2019: Law Enforcement.

Cellebrite-Trend-Survey-Report

Sources

1 “Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2017–2022 White Paper”. Cisco, 2019, https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-738429.html. Accessed 2 Apr 2019.

2 Cellebrite. Cellebrite Annual Industry Trend Survey 2019: Law Enforcement. Cellebrite, 2019, p. 3. Accessed 2 Apr 2019.

3 Ibid, 4.

4 Ibid, 9.

5 Ibid, 13.

Additional Reading

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use

ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and DALL-E, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).

ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on ComplexDiscovery.com. By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.

 

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know, and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a highly recognized digital publication focused on providing detailed insights into the fields of cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery. Based in Estonia, a hub for digital innovation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ upholds rigorous standards in journalistic integrity, delivering nuanced analyses of global trends, technology advancements, and the eDiscovery sector. The publication expertly connects intricate legal technology issues with the broader narrative of international business and current events, offering its readership invaluable insights for informed decision-making.

For the latest in law, technology, and business, visit ComplexDiscovery.com.