Content Assessment: Experiencing an Info Glut? Taming Information Overload

Information - 92%
Insight - 91%
Relevance - 88%
Objectivity - 90%
Authority - 94%

91%

Excellent

A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit of the post highlighting a recent report by Tibor Koltay on information overload.

Editor’s Note: From time to time, ComplexDiscovery highlights publicly available or privately purchasable announcements, content updates, and research from cyber, data, and legal discovery providers, research organizations, and ComplexDiscovery community members. While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions.

To submit recommendations for consideration and inclusion in ComplexDiscovery’s cyber, data, and legal discovery-centric service, product, or research announcements, contact us today.


Shared* with permission from educator and author Tibor Koltay, a retired faculty member at Eszterházy Károly University, the following paper explains and explores challenges associated with information overload. This paper may be especially useful for cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery leaders as they face decisions on competing opinions and recommendations on subjective and preferential topics from individuals who may have an awareness of information, a source of information, yet lack practical understanding and experience on the topics, relying on their roles to buttress the credibility of their recommendations rather than rigorous intellectual honesty.

Educational Paper by Tibor Koltay

Taming Information Overload

Coping Strategies: Article Extract

There are some common strategies when we are faced with information overload (IO). Overloaded people often avoid, forget, or destroy information and data. Deciding what to keep, is a question of establishing the credibility of their sources through critical assessment that should be coupled with making use of adequate filters to information. These processes also may lead to withdrawing from information by limiting the number of notifications received, unfollowing social media accounts, ignoring e-mails, or social media messages entirely or for a limited period. Satisficing, also termed bounded rationality, is also a way of making choices when we think that it is not feasible to compare the benefits of possible options thoroughly. In essence, satisficing is a way of efficiently getting something that is good enough for the purpose, although this solution may not be deemed necessarily optimal.

The Effect of Social Media: Article Extract

In order to avoid being overloaded, many people deal with information by unwittingly applying the principle of least effort. Acquiring information through social networking services (SNS) involves minimal physical, technical, and mental effort, especially if it fits someone’s prior beliefs. In consequence, people do not always invest their full mental capacities in the tasks of information acquisition and evaluation.


Read the Complete Paper – “Taming” Information Overload (PDF) – Mouseover to  Scroll

Taming Information Overload

Read the original paper.

Reference: Koltay, T. “Taming” information overload. Academia Letters. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL272.

*Open Access – Distributed Under CC BY 4.0.


Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery

 

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know, and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a highly recognized digital publication focused on providing detailed insights into the fields of cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery. Based in Estonia, a hub for digital innovation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ upholds rigorous standards in journalistic integrity, delivering nuanced analyses of global trends, technology advancements, and the eDiscovery sector. The publication expertly connects intricate legal technology issues with the broader narrative of international business and current events, offering its readership invaluable insights for informed decision-making.

For the latest in law, technology, and business, visit ComplexDiscovery.com.

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use

ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude, DALL-E2, Grammarly, Midjourney, and Perplexity, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).

ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on ComplexDiscovery.com. By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.