Activity Patterns for eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments (2001-2017)

Since beginning to track the number of publicly highlighted merger, acquisition, and investment (M&A+I) events in the eDiscovery ecosystem, ComplexDiscovery has noted more than 300 M&A+I events between November 2001 and today. The following article highlights the pattern of these activities on an annual and monthly basis.

Patterns for eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments

Since beginning to track the number of publicly highlighted merger, acquisition, and investment (M&A+I) events in the eDiscovery ecosystem, ComplexDiscovery has noted more than 300 M&A+I events between November 2001 and today.

While not all inclusive due to the fact that M&A+I events are not always publicly disclosed, the abridged listing of M&A+I events maintained by ComplexDiscovery notes key industry business moves by sharing event date, company involvement, and event amount (if known).

Based on an aggregate review of the abridged listing through the lens of annual and monthly activity rates, the following findings, data points, and tracking charts may be useful for understanding M&A+I activity patterns in the eDiscovery ecosystem.

Updated December 30, 2017

Six Key Findings

  • There have been at least 300 M&A+I events in the eDiscovery ecosystem since 2001. (n=317)
  • 2012 has been the most active year for M&A+I events since with at least 49 total events.
  • 2017 appears to be off to the slowest start in terms of total M&A+I events since 2010 (January through November).
  • The decrease in total M&A+I between 2012 and 2013 appears to be the most significant yearly drop in terms of events and percentage of events since 2001.
  • May and June have been the most active months for M&A+I events since 2001.
  • April has been the least active month for M&A+I events since 2001.

M&A+I Data Points

Activity By Year (2001-2017)

  • 2017 – 23
  • 2016 – 36
  • 2015 – 40
  • 2014 – 35
  • 2013 – 22
  • 2012 – 49
  • 2011 – 23
  • 2010 – 19
  • 2009 – 13
  • 2008 – 15
  • 2007 – 12
  • 2006 – 17
  • 2005 – 5
  • 2004 – 4
  • 2003 – 2
  • 2002 – 1
  • 2001 – 1

Activity By Month (2001-2017)

  • January – 31
  • February – 17
  • March – 30
  • April – 16
  • May – 35
  • June – 37
  • July – 26
  • August – 28
  • September – 26
  • October – 30
  • November – 22
  • December – 19

M&A+I Tracking Charts

(Charts Can Be Expanded for Detailed Viewing)

Chart 1: An Overview of Merger, Acquisition, and Investment Events by Year (2001-2017)

2001-2017 M&A+I – Year

Chart 2: An Overview of Merger, Acquisition, and Investment Events by Calendar Month (2001-2017)

2001-2017 M&A+I – Month

Investing in eDiscovery Running Listings

Source: Original Research

ComplexSocial-Icon-135x135-Transparent

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights data and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by business, information technology, and legal professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding data and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of data and legal discovery organizations. Registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world, ComplexDiscovery OÜ operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

A (Brand) New Approach? Considering the Framework and Structure of eDiscovery Offerings

Today’s eDiscovery providers may benefit from the lessons learned in the creation of the Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band album by creating a concept for branding and packaging their offerings within that brand in a connected, theme-based way that represents the offerings’ promise and capability in a way that is easy to understand and remember.

This fictionalized branding approach was developed from the intellectual exercise of trying to figure out a reasonable and memorable way to descriptively highlight the promise and capabilities of offerings typically delivered by full-service eDiscovery providers. It may not be completely comprehensive or fully normalized. However, the hope of sharing this branding example is that it might help those involved in the branding and communication of eDiscovery provider services and solutions.

First Legal Acquires eDiscovery Provider Redpoint Technologies

According to Alex Martinez, CEO of First Legal, “Both First Legal...

Veristar Acquires Planet Data

According to Veristar company founder, CEO, and president Rick Avers, “We...

Questel Acquires doeLEGAL

doeLEGAL today announced that it has been acquired by intellectual property...

Following the Money? Mike Bryant Provides a SOLID Look at Legal Tech Merger and Acquisition Activity

From seed and venture capital investments to private equity and Special...

A New Era in eDiscovery? Framing Market Growth Through the Lens of Six Eras

There are many excellent resources for considering chronological and historiographical approaches...

An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2020-2025 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

While the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for worldwide eDiscovery software...

Resetting the Baseline? eDiscovery Market Size Adjustments for 2020

An unanticipated pandemeconomic-driven retraction in eDiscovery spending during 2020 has resulted...

Home or Away? New eDiscovery Collection Market Sizing and Pricing Considerations

One of the key home (onsite) or away (remote) decisions that...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for February 2021

From litigation trends and legal tech investing to facial recognition and...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for January 2021

From eDiscovery business confidence and operational metrics to merger and acquisition...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for December 2020

May the peace and joy of the holiday season be with...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for November 2020

From market sizing and cyber law to industry investments and customer...

HaystackID Recognized in IDC MarketScape for eDiscovery Services

According to HaystackID CEO Hal Brooks, “We are proud to once...

A Generational View of Remote Security? HaystackID™ Releases 3.0 Security Enhancements to Review Technology

According to HaystackID's Senior Vice President and General Manager for Review...

Only a Matter of Time? HaystackID Launches New Service for Data Breach Discovery and Review

According to HaystackID's Chief Innovation Officer and President of Global Investigations,...

It’s a Match! Focusing on the Total Cost of eDiscovery Review with ReviewRight Match

As a leader in remote legal document review, HaystackID provides clients...

Cold Weather Catch? Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey – Spring 2021 Results

The Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey is a non-scientific semi-annual...

Out of the Woods? Eighteen Observations on eDiscovery Business Confidence in the Winter of 2021

In the winter of 2021, 85.0% of eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey...

Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Winter 2021 Overview

In the winter of 2021, 43.3% of respondents viewed budgetary constraints...

Not So Outstanding? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Winter of 2021

In the winter of 2021, eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey more...