Wed. Aug 10th, 2022
    en flag
    nl flag
    et flag
    fi flag
    fr flag
    de flag
    he flag
    ja flag
    lv flag
    pl flag
    pt flag
    ru flag
    es flag

    Content Assessment: Embracing Differences? Interplay of Digital Forensics in eDiscovery

    Information - 95%
    Insight - 90%
    Relevance - 95%
    Objectivity - 95%
    Authority - 90%

    93%

    Excellent

    A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit of the post highlighting recent research on the interplay of digital forensics in eDiscovery.

    Editor’s Note: From time to time, ComplexDiscovery highlights publicly available or privately purchasable announcements, content updates, and research from cyber, data, and legal discovery providers, research organizations, and ComplexDiscovery community members. While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions.

    To submit recommendations for consideration and inclusion in ComplexDiscovery’s cyber, data, and legal discovery-centric service, product, or research announcements, contact us today.


    Industry Report by Sundar Krishnan and Narasimha Shashidhar

    Interplay of Digital Forensics in eDiscovery

    Shared with permission from authors Sundar Krishnan and Narasimha Shashidhar, the following paper explores the relationship between the disciplines of digital forensics and eDiscovery and highlights key areas of interest ranging from digital forensics skills to forensic opportunities relative to the eDiscovery industry.

    Abstract

    Digital forensics is often confused with eDiscovery (electronic discovery). However, both the fields are highly independent of the other but slightly overlap to assist each other in a symbiotic relationship. With decreasing costs of cloud storage, growing Internet speeds, and growing capacity of portable storage media, their chances of being used in a crime have grown. Sifting through large volumes of evidential data during eDiscovery or forensically investigating them requires teams from both these fields to work together on a case. In this paper, the authors discuss the relationship between these disciplines and highlight the digital forensic skills required, sub-disciplines of digital forensics, the possible electronic artifacts that can be encountered in a case, and the forensic opportunities relative to the eDiscovery industry. Lastly, the authors touch upon the best practices in digital evidence management during the eDiscovery process.

    Introduction Extract

    When a civil lawsuit is filed, both the parties in the lawsuit engage in a pre-trial process known as “discovery”. During this process, each party may request documents and other evidence from the other or compel the other to produce such evidence using subpoenas or other legal instruments.

    When such documents or evidence are in an electronic/digital format, this process is known as eDiscovery. Any potentially relevant digital evidence deemed necessary by either party may be subject to the eDiscovery process. This corpus of electronic/digital documents or other evidence is known as Electronically Stored Information (ESI). When civil litigation is reasonably anticipated by an organization or individual, they are expected to preserve prospective ESI from destruction. If/When litigation commences, eDiscovery follows wherein each party may be required to declare their ESI relevant to the case. Suppose the other party to the litigation requests this ESI for their own case preparation, the other party may produce this ESI in its original format if it seems related to the case, not privileged, within reasonable costs, and is reasonably accessible. Such ESI may not always be readily available and may need skilled professionals to forensically extract it from electronic devices. Thus, digital forensic professionals may participate alongside Discovery teams from both parties in forensically producing ESI during litigation. Parties to the case may engage digital forensic professionals on both sides if needed to assist in forensically producing ESI and also in validating the other’s ESI production methods.

    Initially, the field of digital forensics was limited to personal computer disks. However, over the last few decades as computers have become connected through networks (local and the Internet) coupled with the growth of the cloud and smart devices such as smartphones, Internet Of Things (IoT), smart medical devices, smart energy grids, smart wearables, etc., personal computer forensics has now grown into digital forensics to encompass the investigation and analysis of these smart devices. The field of digital forensics has also expanded to include network forensics as well, which focuses on investigating networks for security breaches, hacking attempts, and data theft. In the last few decades, federal/state criminal investigators, global corporations, law firms, and private/public enterprises have relied on digital forensic investigators to investigate issues involving criminal activities, intellectual property theft, patent infringement, data theft, misconduct, and embezzlement. A digital forensic professional is someone who has a desire to follow the evidence, thereby assisting the lead investigators by identifying and analyzing digital clues from a pile of digital evidence. Digital forensic experts require a specialized skills to investigate various platforms such as the Internet, computers, smartphones, cloud, IoT, medical devices, accounting data, etc. To become a part of a digital forensic team, a digital forensic professional needs to coordinate with different teams in the investigation. Other teams in an investigation may be from law enforcement when in criminal cases and eDiscovery teams when in non-criminal (civil) litigation.


    Complete Paper: Interplay of Digital Forensics in eDiscovery (PDF) – Mouseover to Scroll

    IJCSS-1602 - Interplay of Digital Forensics in eDiscovery

    Read the original paper.

    Reference: Krishnan, S. and Shashidhar, N., 2021. Interplay of Digital Forensics in eDiscovery. [online] International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS), pp.19-44. Available at: https://www.cscjournals.org/manuscript/Journals/IJCSS/Volume15/Issue2/IJCSS-1602.pdf.


    Additional Reading

    Source: ComplexDiscovery

     

     

    Have a Request?

    If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

    ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights cyber, data, and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding cyber, data, and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

    ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of cyber, data, and legal discovery organizations. Focused primarily on supporting the ComplexDiscovery publication, the company is registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world. The company operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

    The Tip of the Iceberg? New ENISA Report on Threat Landscape for Ransomware Attacks

    According to ENISA, this threat landscape report analyzed a total of...

    Consumers Paying the Price? Cost of a Data Breach Hits Record High According to New IBM Report

    According to IBM Security, the annual Cost of a Data Breach Report...

    Safeguarding ePHI? NIST Updates Guidance for Health Care Cybersecurity

    This new NIST Special Publication aims to help educate readers about...

    Countering Threat Actors? Using Social Network Analysis for Cyber Threat Intelligence (CCDCOE)

    According to the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE)...

    Live with Leeds? Exterro Completes Recapitalization in Excess of $1 Billion

    According to the press release, with the support of a group...

    TCDI Completes Acquisition of Aon’s eDiscovery Practice

    According to TCDI Founder and CEO Bill Johnson, “We chose Aon’s...

    eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in Q2 2022

    From Magnet Forensics and TCDI to ArcherHall, the following findings, data...

    TCDI to Acquire Aon’s eDiscovery Practice

    According to TCDI Founder and CEO Bill Johnson, “For 30 years,...

    On the Move? 2022 eDiscovery Market Kinetics: Five Areas of Interest

    Recently ComplexDiscovery was provided an opportunity to share with the eDiscovery...

    Trusting the Process? 2021 eDiscovery Processing Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    The Year in Review? 2021 eDiscovery Review Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    A 2021 Look at eDiscovery Collection: Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for July 2022

    From lurking business undercurrents to captivating deepfake developments, the July 2022...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for June 2022

    From eDiscovery ecosystem players and pricing to data breach investigations and...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for May 2022

    From eDiscovery pricing and buyers to cyberattacks and incident response, the...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for April 2022

    From cyber attack statistics and frameworks to eDiscovery investments and providers,...

    Inflection or Deflection? An Aggregate Overview of Eight Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Surveys

    Initiated in the winter of 2019 and conducted eight times with...

    Changing Currents? Eighteen Observations on eDiscovery Business Confidence in the Summer of 2022

    In the summer of 2022, 54.8% of survey respondents felt that...

    Challenging Variants? Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Summer 2022 Overview

    In the summer of 2022, 28.8% of respondents viewed increasing types...

    Downshift Time? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Summer of 2022

    In the summer of 2022, 65 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey participants...

    Droning On? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (August 3 – 7, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Assuaging Distress? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (July 29 – August 2, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Momentum Challenges? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (July 24 – 28, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Port Support? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (July 19 – 23, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...