NATO’s Counter-Drone Solution: Inside the Merops Deployment Reshaping European Air Defense

Editor’s Note: NATO’s deployment of the Merops counter-drone system along its eastern flank marks a pivotal evolution in air defense—one that cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals should follow closely. Merops is a compact, AI-driven platform that integrates radar, optical sensors, and autonomous interceptor drones to detect and neutralize unmanned aerial threats, even under electronic warfare conditions. Its ability to operate independently of GPS or communications links introduces new operational realities where autonomous systems generate actionable intelligence and digital decision trails. For professionals managing data, risk, and legal accountability, the intersection of AI-driven targeting, sensor fusion, and autonomous engagement raises important questions about data provenance, auditability, and governance in high-stakes, real-time environments.

Background Note: ComplexDiscovery’s staff offers distinctive perspectives on the Russo-Ukrainian war and Middle Eastern conflicts, informed by their military experience on the West German, East German, and Czechoslovakian borders during the Cold War, as well as in Sinai as part of Camp David Accord compliance activities, during the timeframe of the Persian Gulf War. This firsthand regional knowledge has been further enhanced by recent staff travels to Eastern European countries, including Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. These visits have provided up-to-date, on-the-ground insights into the current geopolitical climate in regions directly impacted by the ongoing conflict.

Combined with cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery proficiency, this multifaceted experience enables comprehensive analysis of these conflicts, including the critical impact of cyber warfare, disinformation, and digital forensics on modern military engagements. This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial.

Russo-Ukrainian Conflict Update*

NATO’s Counter-Drone Solution: Inside the Merops Deployment Reshaping European Air Defense

ComplexDiscovery Staff

When NATO officials describe the Merops anti-drone system, they don’t lead with battlefield exploits or geopolitical tensions. They talk about pickup trucks and economics. The American-built platform fits in the back of a midsize vehicle, operates with artificial intelligence when communications fail, and costs dramatically less than scrambling multimillion-dollar fighter jets to intercept drones worth tens of thousands of dollars.

That cost calculus—not the headline-grabbing incursions themselves—is driving NATO’s most substantial counter-drone deployment to date. Poland, Romania, and Denmark are now fielding Merops systems along the alliance’s eastern flank, marking a fundamental shift in Europe’s approach to aerial defense amid rising unmanned threats.

“It’s able to target the drones and take them down and at a low cost as well,” said Colonel Mark McLellan of NATO Allied Land Command. “It’s a lot cheaper than flying an F-35 into the air to take them down with a missile.”

The deployment represents more than a tactical response. It signals NATO’s acceptance that protecting vast territories against low-cost aerial threats through traditional fighter intercepts proves economically unsustainable—a reality underscored when Poland scrambled jets in September to counter approximately 20 Russian drones that penetrated its airspace during strikes on Ukraine.

Technology That Operates When Others Fail

Merops distinguishes itself through its ability to function under electronic warfare conditions that would disable conventional systems. The modular counter-unmanned aerial system combines radars, electro-optical and infrared cameras, and AI algorithms to detect and classify small drones, then routes targets to command and control stations for manual or automated engagement decisions.

What sets the platform apart is its interception methodology. Rather than relying solely on jamming—which sophisticated adversaries can defeat—Merops launches small interceptor drones that physically neutralize or divert hostile aircraft. These interceptors use autonomous navigation to operate when GPS signals are denied or when electronic attack conditions prevail.

“Merops basically flies drones against drones,” McLellan explained, noting that information from the system can be transmitted to ground or air forces for coordinated responses.

Brigadier General Thomas Lowin, deputy chief of staff operations at NATO Allied Land Command, emphasized the system’s flexibility: “Merops gives commanders a certain amount of time to be able to assess the threat and decide—to shoot or not shoot.”

The technology addresses a specific detection challenge. Drones fly low and slow, making them difficult to pinpoint on radar systems calibrated for high-speed missiles. They can be mistaken for birds or civilian aircraft—gaps that Merops helps close through its integrated sensor array and machine learning classification capabilities.

Poland Charts Independent Course

While NATO deploys Merops, Poland pursues a parallel strategy that prioritizes domestic technological development over waiting for broader European initiatives. Deputy Defense Minister Cezary Tomczyk announced in early November that Poland would launch its own comprehensive anti-drone system within months, explicitly rejecting dependency on the European Union’s proposed “drone wall.”

“We agree with the idea of strengthening the defense of the skies over the entire European Union and are willing to consider external proposals or solutions,” Tomczyk told Bloomberg. “But we give priority to national projects.”

The Polish approach centers on building layered capabilities spanning detection, jamming, and neutralization as part of a broader air defense program. The first components are expected to be operational within three months of the November announcement, with full system completion targeted within two years.

Tomczyk specified that at least half of the contracts for the anti-drone system should go to domestic companies, ensuring Poland develops indigenous capabilities rather than relying exclusively on foreign suppliers. The program will be financed through the European Union’s Security Action for Europe (SAFE) loan scheme, under which Poland received the largest allocation among member states: €43.7 billion from the €150 billion total fund.

“A counter-drone weapon must be comprehensive,” Tomczyk stated. “It should consist of various sensors and effectors operating simultaneously, first detecting and identifying objects, and then neutralizing them.”

The strategy reflects lessons from Ukraine’s conflict, where both Russian and Ukrainian forces demonstrate daily how unmanned weapon systems operate across air, land, and sea domains. Poland’s geographic position—bordering Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine—adds urgency to developing robust aerial defenses that can function independently if broader European coordination falters.

“The way in which both Russians and Ukrainians are using unmanned weapon systems today shows that strengthening our capabilities in this area must be a priority in all spheres of activity,” Tomczyk noted.

Poland’s initiative positions the country at the forefront of European counter-drone development while maintaining compatibility with NATO systems, such as Merops. The dual-track approach—deploying proven American technology immediately while building domestic alternatives for long-term autonomy—represents a pragmatic response to threats that won’t wait for international bureaucracies to align.

Germany’s Rapid Response Model

While Poland builds for the future, Germany demonstrated how bilateral cooperation can address immediate threats. When Belgium faced repeated drone incursions over military installations in early November, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius and Chief of Defense Carsten Breuer moved swiftly to provide specialized support.

The Belgian incidents involved multiple large drones conducting reconnaissance operations over the Kleine-Brogel Air Base on November 2-3, evading jamming attempts and outmaneuvering pursuit helicopters. The facility houses F-16 fighters, will receive incoming F-35 aircraft, and reportedly stores U.S. tactical nuclear weapons. Belgian officials characterized the operations as deliberate rather than accidental, noting their precision and duration.

“These anti-drone units are being established right now,” Lieutenant General Alexander Sollfrank, who heads Germany’s joint operations command, told Reuters. Germany was the only country capable of helping “immediately and comprehensively” with Belgium’s “considerable drone problem,” Defense Minister Pistorius explained.

German Luftwaffe specialists arrived in Belgium within days of the request, bringing expertise and equipment to assess situations on the ground and coordinate with Belgian forces. The deployment included both detection capabilities and what Sollfrank described as “effectors”—systems that can assume control of unauthorized drones and land them at designated locations.

“They have various systems to spot and counter drones,” Sollfrank said. “We have the option, for example, to assume control over a drone and land it at a specific location.”

The German teams also deploy interceptor drones that eject nets to capture hostile aircraft, as well as units that physically ram intruders. Sollfrank noted that a similar German team supported Copenhagen during an EU summit in October, equipped with sensors and electronic warfare capabilities.

The Bundeswehr described the mission as demonstrating “strong security cooperation within the alliance and Europe’s collective capacity to respond to hybrid threats,” while emphasizing the deployment’s limited duration—though specific timelines remained classified for operational security.

Belgium’s Defense Minister Theo Francken announced a €50 million investment in counter-drone capabilities, with longer-term plans for comprehensive national coverage. The Belgian response included authorization for police and military forces to neutralize suspicious drones when necessary—a legal framework adjustment that several European nations now contemplate.

The Schmidt Connection

Behind Merops lies an unusual Silicon Valley connection. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt has invested in the technology through a web of companies, including entities named Merops, White Stork (later rebranded Project Eagle), and Volya Robotics, registered in Estonia.

Schmidt’s involvement extends beyond financial backing. His companies have recruited engineers from Apple, SpaceX, Google, and federal agencies to develop AI-guided systems, conducting tests both at Schmidt’s Hillspire family office facility in California and on battlefields in Ukraine. Ukrainian sources describe Schmidt’s interceptor drones as highly effective against Russian Shahed-type aircraft, with Ukrainian media reporting that approximately 90 percent of Shahed drones intercepted by drone systems are attributed to Schmidt’s technology—though independent verification of these performance metrics remains limited.

The former Google executive has been vocal about his vision for drone warfare, penning op-eds advocating that the Pentagon “get rid of the tanks and buy drones instead” and describing future conflicts featuring “murmurations of starlings—ruthless swarms of AI-powered kamikaze drones” that algorithmically target enemies despite electronic countermeasures.

Both Schmidt and the companies involved maintain low public profiles, declining interview requests. Defense officials from Poland and Romania similarly refused to comment publicly on the Merops deployment details, citing operational security.

Building the Eastern Defense Line

NATO’s deployment of Merops forms part of a broader strategic vision: making the alliance’s border with Russia—from Norway in the north to Turkey in the south—so well-defended that Moscow’s forces are deterred from contemplating incursions.

Military leaders advocate for strengthening NATO’s eastern defenses through integrated sensor networks and command-and-control systems adaptable to evolving technologies. The approach acknowledges that prolonged drone battles—or full-scale conflicts as witnessed in Ukraine—would drain Western treasuries and deplete limited missile stockpiles.

European companies are responding by developing new technologies, including drone-against-drone systems and anti-drone missiles, while EU countries work toward the proposed “drone wall” on the bloc’s eastern border.

Denmark’s participation in the Merops deployment follows drone incidents that prompted authorities to impose a nationwide ban on civilian drone flights, with violations carrying penalties of up to two years’ imprisonment. Romanian forces scrambled four military aircraft in October to monitor Russian attacks near the border, though no drones crossed into national territory. The defense ministry has authorized pilots to shoot down any unmanned aircraft that does.

The multinational response reflects recognition that drone proliferation represents an enduring challenge requiring coordinated technological solutions rather than isolated national efforts. NATO’s deployment of Merops—combined with Poland’s domestic development program and Germany’s bilateral support model—creates a three-tiered approach: immediate capability through proven systems, medium-term indigenous alternatives, and rapid-response frameworks for acute threats.

The question facing European defense planners is whether these initiatives can scale quickly enough to match the pace of aerial threats that continue to probe NATO’s vulnerabilities while adversaries refine their tactics based on real-world operations in Ukraine.

News Sources

• American Anti-Drone Systems Deployed in Poland (Notes from Poland)
• Russian Drone Incursions Rattle Europe; Poland, Romania Deploy Countermeasures (ABC News)
• NATO Deploys AI-Powered Merops System to Counter Russian Drone Threats (United24 Media)
• Poland and Romania Deploy New AI-Driven Weapons System to Counter Russian Drones (SSBCrack)
• Germany Sends Drone Defense Experts to Belgium After Reconnaissance Incidents (Defense News)

Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

Additional Reading

• Infrastructure Strike Escalation: Ukraine and Russia Trade Blows Across Critical Nodes
• From Dissent to OSINT? Understanding, Influencing, and Protecting Roles, Reputation, and Revenue
• Data Embassies: Sovereignty, Security, and Continuity for Nation-States

Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ