Norton Rose Fulbright Releases 2019 Litigation Trends Annual Survey

Released in December of 2019, Norton Rose Fulbright’s 2019 Litigation Trends Annual Survey highlighted that a majority of corporate counsel respondents foresee an economic downtown that will lead to a rise in disputes. Additionally, the number of in-house counsel who rated cybersecurity and privacy as the most important litigation issue facing them doubled from 2018 to 2019. Respondents said worries over cybersecurity and data protection risks are rooted in the volume of such threats, the creativity of cyber criminals, the sensitive nature of some data content and some jurisdictions’ enactment of stringent data privacy laws.

en flag
nl flag
fi flag
fr flag
de flag
pt flag
ru flag
es flag

Press Announcement (December 11, 2019)

Norton Rose Fulbright Releases 2019 Litigation Trends Annual Survey

Survey Link (PDF)

In global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright’s 2019 Litigation Trends Annual Survey, a majority of corporate counsel respondents said they foresee an economic downturn that will lead to a rise in disputes. Many companies, the survey found, have begun taking preventative steps to manage the increased risk posed by the growing number of disputes.

Most survey respondents fear that the extended economic recovery following the Great Recession will give way to a downturn, and the economic slowdown will lead to increased litigation, particularly in employment and labor as well as contract disputes.

Gerry Pecht, Norton Rose Fulbright’s Global Head of Dispute Resolution and Litigation, said:

“A rise in disputes typically accompanies an economic downturn. If the economy goes sour, more deals may fail, more contracts will fall through, and employees will be laid off. A rise in employment and labor litigation has already begun. When asked for the three most common disputes that their companies face, nearly half of our survey respondents included employment/labor and contract disputes.”

The 2017 and 2018 editions of Litigation Trends saw cybersecurity and data protection concerns coming to the forefront as a key challenge in dispute management. That trend escalates even more greatly this year, with respondents reporting an increase in data privacy disputes.

The number of in-house counsel who rated cybersecurity and data privacy as the most important litigation issue facing them doubled from 2018 to 2019. More than half of those surveyed (52 percent) feel more exposed than previously to such disputes.

Respondents said worries over cybersecurity and data protection risks are rooted in the volume of such threats, the creativity of cyber criminals, the sensitive nature of some data content and some jurisdictions’ enactment of stringent data privacy laws.

Norton Rose Fulbright’s 15th annual litigation trends survey is based on polling 287 corporate counsel — primarily general counsel — representing US-based organizations on disputes-related issues and concerns.

An expansive report detailing the survey’s findings is available at Highlights of the report include:

  • During the next few years, 44 percent of corporate counsel foresee cybersecurity and data protection as a new source of disputes.
  • More than 80 percent of companies conduct third-party and/or in-house assessments of cybersecurity and data protection risks, and such assessments are sound ways of reducing these types of risks.
  • Companies in 2019 whose in-house counsel took part in the survey on average spent US$1.5 million on disputes and employed 2.5 disputes lawyers per US$1 billion of revenue.
  • Regulatory intervention is still a key area of concern for in-house counsel, appearing in the top five most concerning types of disputes.
  • Two effective ways to prevent litigation – embedding lawyers within business operations and early case evaluation/resolution – have yet to gain real traction and present a real opportunity for proactive legal departments seeking to mitigate risk. Providing training is another popular and effective preventative measure.
  • Thirty-five percent of corporate counsel – 8 percent more than in 2018 – expect disputes to increase in the next year.
  • Nearly two-thirds of corporate counsel said economic downturns lead to an increase in litigation cases.
  • Seventeen percent of corporate counsel expect to increase the size of their in-house legal teams in 2020.
  • While not the most frequently occurring dispute type, intellectual property disputes are the most concerning type of dispute faced by companies.

Introduced in 2004, this report is the longest-running survey of corporate counsel on litigation issues and trends. The 15th edition of Norton Rose Fulbright’s Litigation Trends Annual Survey was conducted by Acritas, a global legal services research firm.

Notes For Editors:

Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. The firm has more than 4,000 lawyers and other legal staff based in Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa and the Middle East.

Recognized for its industry focus, Norton Rose Fulbright is strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare. Through its global risk advisory group, the firm leverages its industry experience with its knowledge of legal, regulatory, compliance and governance issues to provide clients with practical solutions to the legal and regulatory risks facing their businesses.

Norton Rose Fulbright operates in accordance with its global business principles of quality, unity and integrity, aiming to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of its offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss verein, helps coordinate the activities of Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients. Norton Rose Fulbright has offices in more than 50 cities worldwide, including London, Houston, New York, Toronto, Mexico City, Hong Kong, Sydney and Johannesburg. For more information, see

Lagniappe Extract on Regulatory Proceedings

Although many are not facing proceedings themselves, concerns about the complexity of requests – especially in terms of the volume of data required and the challenge of multi-jurisdictional requirements – are common refrains about the added strains such legal proceedings place on in-house departments. As one respondent shared on the challenge of regulatory intervention, “Larger document requests from regulators [are a concern]. Many regulators have increased their capacity to intake, process, and review large amounts of data. This means that they are no longer as willing to negotiate the scope of enormous requests.”

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights data and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by business, information technology, and legal professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding data and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of data and legal discovery organizations. Registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world, ComplexDiscovery OÜ operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

A (Brand) New Approach? Considering the Framework and Structure of eDiscovery Offerings

Today’s eDiscovery providers may benefit from the lessons learned in the creation of the Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band album by creating a concept for branding and packaging their offerings within that brand in a connected, theme-based way that represents the offerings’ promise and capability in a way that is easy to understand and remember.

This fictionalized branding approach was developed from the intellectual exercise of trying to figure out a reasonable and memorable way to descriptively highlight the promise and capabilities of offerings typically delivered by full-service eDiscovery providers. It may not be completely comprehensive or fully normalized. However, the hope of sharing this branding example is that it might help those involved in the branding and communication of eDiscovery provider services and solutions.

First Legal Acquires eDiscovery Provider Redpoint Technologies

According to Alex Martinez, CEO of First Legal, “Both First Legal...

Veristar Acquires Planet Data

According to Veristar company founder, CEO, and president Rick Avers, “We...

Questel Acquires doeLEGAL

doeLEGAL today announced that it has been acquired by intellectual property...

Following the Money? Mike Bryant Provides a SOLID Look at Legal Tech Merger and Acquisition Activity

From seed and venture capital investments to private equity and Special...

A New Era in eDiscovery? Framing Market Growth Through the Lens of Six Eras

There are many excellent resources for considering chronological and historiographical approaches...

An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2020-2025 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

While the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for worldwide eDiscovery software...

Resetting the Baseline? eDiscovery Market Size Adjustments for 2020

An unanticipated pandemeconomic-driven retraction in eDiscovery spending during 2020 has resulted...

Home or Away? New eDiscovery Collection Market Sizing and Pricing Considerations

One of the key home (onsite) or away (remote) decisions that...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for February 2021

From litigation trends and legal tech investing to facial recognition and...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for January 2021

From eDiscovery business confidence and operational metrics to merger and acquisition...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for December 2020

May the peace and joy of the holiday season be with...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for November 2020

From market sizing and cyber law to industry investments and customer...

HaystackID Recognized in IDC MarketScape for eDiscovery Services

According to HaystackID CEO Hal Brooks, “We are proud to once...

A Generational View of Remote Security? HaystackID™ Releases 3.0 Security Enhancements to Review Technology

According to HaystackID's Senior Vice President and General Manager for Review...

Only a Matter of Time? HaystackID Launches New Service for Data Breach Discovery and Review

According to HaystackID's Chief Innovation Officer and President of Global Investigations,...

It’s a Match! Focusing on the Total Cost of eDiscovery Review with ReviewRight Match

As a leader in remote legal document review, HaystackID provides clients...

Cold Weather Catch? Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey – Spring 2021 Results

The Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey is a non-scientific semi-annual...

Out of the Woods? Eighteen Observations on eDiscovery Business Confidence in the Winter of 2021

In the winter of 2021, 85.0% of eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey...

Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Winter 2021 Overview

In the winter of 2021, 43.3% of respondents viewed budgetary constraints...

Not So Outstanding? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Winter of 2021

In the winter of 2021, eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey more...