Ukrainian Precision Strikes Challenge Russian Defenses in Crimea (January 6, 2024)

Source Note: One of the most accurate and detailed sources for ongoing updates on the Ukraine crisis is the Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment from the Institute for the Study of War. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. ISW seeks to promote an informed understanding of war and military affairs through comprehensive, independent, and accessible open-source research and analysis. ISW’s research is made available to the general public, military practitioners, policymakers, and media members. Providing a daily synthesis of key events related to the Russian aggression against Ukraine, ISW updates may benefit investigators and litigators as they follow the business, information technology, and legal trends and trajectories impacted by and stemming from the current Russo-Ukrainian conflict.

For those seeking to grasp the full scope of this evolving landscape, the complete updates from the Institute for the Study of War serve as an invaluable resource.

Russo-Ukrainian Conflict Update*

Ukrainian Precision Strikes Challenge Russian Defenses in Crimea

ComplexDiscovery Staff

The situation on January 6, 2024, in the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian conflict, was marked by significant Ukrainian military activity in occupied Crimea, tactical and operational discussions among Russian forces, and ongoing Western support for Ukraine’s defense infrastructure. Ukrainian forces continued a multi-day strike campaign against Russian military targets in Crimea, demonstrating the ability of their missiles and drones to penetrate Russian air defenses. Notably, Ukrainian forces struck several key locations, including an administrative building at the Saky airfield, a radar position, and an equipment depot near Hryshyne. Additionally, attacks on an air defense radar system and a communications center in Yevpatoria, as well as ammunition warehouses near Pervomaiske and a Russian command post near Sevastopol, were reported.

Russian sources acknowledged these strikes and claimed countermeasures, such as destroying Ukrainian drones and missiles over Crimea and the Black Sea. However, the effectiveness of these defenses remains questionable. Ukrainian Air Force Commander Lieutenant General Mykola Oleshchuk credited Ukrainian pilots for successful operations without specifying the dates of the strikes.

On the Russian side, a milblogger highlighted the need for improved planning and coordination at tactical and operational levels, emphasizing the avoidance of large force accumulations due to Ukrainian strike capabilities. The blogger also recommended preparatory artillery fire and better communication and intelligence exchange among Russian units. Despite these suggestions, ISW noted no significant improvement in Russian offensive operations, particularly around Avdiivka.

Western support remains vital for Ukraine, with ongoing provisions of air defense systems and missiles being crucial.> Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Lieutenant General Ivan Havrylyuk announced the approval of new types of weapons and military equipment, signifying Ukraine’s efforts to expand its defense industrial base. The US State Department reaffirmed the critical nature of American aid, though noting that Ukraine’s growing defense industry might reduce the need for such aid in the future.

Meanwhile, the Danish Ministry of Defense announced a delay in delivering F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine, a development that might affect Ukraine’s air capabilities in the short term.

On the ground, Ukrainian and Russian forces continued positional engagements along the entire line of contact, with no significant changes reported on various fronts, including Eastern Ukraine (Luhansk and Donetsk Oblasts), the Southern Axis, and in Zaporizhia Oblast. In Russian-occupied areas, challenges in providing basic services to residents were reported, reflecting the strain of the ongoing conflict on civil infrastructure and local governance.

Russian mobilization and force generation efforts continued, with the Russian Ministry of Defense focusing on improving housing conditions for military families and offering incentives for service. Technological adaptations were also a focus, especially in bolstering drone and electronic warfare capabilities.

The events of January 6, 2024, illustrate a dynamic and multifaceted conflict, with Ukraine demonstrating increased strike capabilities, Russia grappling with tactical and operational challenges, and the ongoing importance of Western support in sustaining Ukraine’s defense efforts.

News Sources

• Institute for the Study of War (understandingwar.org)
• Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 6, 2024 | Institute for the Study of War (understandingwar.org)

As a leading source for cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery insights, including international investigations and litigation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the importance of awareness regarding alleged and documented criminal acts, particularly in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. While we, following the lead of the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), do not provide detailed coverage of war crimes in our primary reports, we encourage professionals within the eDiscovery ecosystem to stay informed about these activities. This awareness is crucial for understanding potential future legal actions and responsibilities.

Detailed Reporting with Maps for January 6, 2024, from the ISW – Mouseover to Scroll

Review the Detailed Reporting and Maps PDF

About the Institute for the Study of War Research Methodology

ISW’s research methodology relies on both primary and secondary sources, enabling researchers to develop a comprehensive understanding of the situation on the ground. In order to analyze military and political developments in any given area, ISW’s research analysts must wholly understand the systems of enemy and friendly forces. They must also understand the population demographics, physical terrain, politics, and history of that area. This lays the analytical foundation for understanding the reasons for particular developments and fulfilling their assigned research objectives. ISW analysts also spend time in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in order to gain a better understanding of the security and political situation and to evaluate the implementation of current strategies and policies. Our researchers compile data and analyze trends, producing a granular analysis of developments in areas of research, producing an accurate, high-resolution, timely, and thorough picture of the situation. ISW’s research methodology guarantees its success and commitment to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations, achieve strategic objectives, and respond to emerging problems that may require the use of American military power.

About the Institute for the Study of War

The Institute for the Study of War advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education. We are committed to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations and respond to emerging threats in order to achieve U.S. strategic objectives. ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization.

Learn more, get involved, and contribute today.

Additional Reading

• From Dissent to OSINT? Understanding, Influencing, and Protecting Roles, Reputation, and Revenue
• [Annual Update] International Cyber Law in Practice: Interactive Toolkit
• Data Embassies: Sovereignty, Security, and Continuity for Nation-States

Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

* Sourced and shared with direct express permission from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

Source: ComplexDiscovery