ARCHIVED CONTENT
You are viewing ARCHIVED CONTENT released online between 1 April 2010 and 24 August 2018 or content that has been selectively archived and is no longer active. Content in this archive is NOT UPDATED, and links may not function.By Victor Li
Attorneys representing a group of employees suing public relations company Publicis over gender discrimination claims took their e-discovery dispute with U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck (So. District, N.Y.) to the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, in Monique Da Silva Moore, et al. v. Publicis Groupe SA and MSLGroup, 11 Civ. 1279. In a petition for certiorari filed with the court, attorneys representing lead plaintiff Monique Da Silva Moore and five other employees argued that Peck, who approved an e-discovery protocol agreed to by the parties that included predictive coding technology, should have recused himself given his previous public statements expressing strong support of predictive coding.
Read the original article at: ‘Da Silva Moore’ Goes to Washington