FTC and DOJ Announce Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines for Public Comment

According to Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, “The revised draft guidelines are based on new economic understandings and the agencies’ experience over the past several decades and better reflect the agencies’ actual practice in evaluating proposed vertical mergers. Once finalized, the Vertical Merger Guidelines will provide more clarity and transparency on how we review vertical transactions.”

en flag
nl flag
et flag
fi flag
fr flag
de flag
pt flag
ru flag
es flag

Editor’s Note: On January 10, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division released a draft of the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines for public comment. Designed to reflect the evolution of policy since the issuance of the 1984 Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines, the complete release announcing the draft guidelines and a full copy of the proposed guidelines are provided for your consideration.

Press Announcement from the FTC and DOJ

FTC and DOJ Announce Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines for Public Comment

The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division seek public comment on draft 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines. The draft guidelines, open to comment for 30 days, describe how the federal antitrust agencies review vertical mergers to evaluate whether the mergers violate antitrust law. Vertical mergers combine two or more companies that operate at different levels in the same supply chain. The draft guidelines outline the agencies’ principal analytical techniques, practices, and enforcement policy for vertical mergers.

The agencies will review and consider the public comments before issuing final Vertical Merger Guidelines. The agencies cooperated closely in preparing the draft guidelines, which reflect the agencies’ significant experience in analyzing vertical mergers. The guidelines are intended to assist the business community and antitrust practitioners by providing transparency about the agencies’ antitrust enforcement policy with respect to vertical mergers.

“Challenging anticompetitive vertical mergers is essential to vigorous enforcement. The agencies’ vertical merger policy has evolved substantially since the issuance of the 1984 Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines, and our guidelines should reflect the current enforcement approach. Greater transparency about the complex issues surrounding vertical mergers will benefit the business community, practitioners, and the courts,” said FTC Chairman Joseph J. Simons. “We invite comments from all stakeholders to help ensure that the guidelines clearly and accurately convey the agencies’ antitrust enforcement policy with respect to vertical mergers.”

“While many vertical mergers are competitively beneficial or neutral, both the Department and the Federal Trade Commission have recognized for over 25 years that some vertical transactions can raise serious concern,” said Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “The revised draft guidelines are based on new economic understandings and the agencies’ experience over the past several decades and better reflect the agencies’ actual practice in evaluating proposed vertical mergers. Once finalized, the Vertical Merger Guidelines will provide more clarity and transparency on how we review vertical transactions. I look forward to receiving comments on these draft guidelines and working with the Federal Trade Commission in finalizing them.”

“I appreciate the Antitrust Division working to update this decades-old statement regarding the practices and policies of the federal enforcement agencies in this critical area, in coordination with the Federal Trade Commission,” said Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen. “As this effort demonstrates, the Department of Justice is committed to principled and transparent antitrust enforcement, which promotes free enterprise, market competition, and ultimately the welfare of American consumers. We look forward to public input and finalizing this important work, along with the FTC.”

The draft guidelines adopt the principles and analytical frameworks in the agencies’ Horizontal Merger Guidelines, including market definition, the analytic framework for evaluating entry considerations, the treatment of the acquisition of a failing firm or its assets, and the acquisition of a partial ownership interest. The draft guidelines describe the analytical and enforcement considerations that are specific to vertical mergers.

The draft guidelines:

+ describe potential anticompetitive effects resulting from vertical mergers, which may include both unilateral and coordinated effects;
+ identify foreclosure and raising rivals’ costs and access to competitively sensitive information as potential elements of antitrust harm under unilateral effects;
+ describe an analytic framework for analyzing potential anticompetitive effects of foreclosure and raising rivals’ costs;
+ discuss how the elimination of double marginalization may mitigate or completely neutralize the potential anticompetitive effects of vertical mergers;
+ discuss cognizable merger efficiencies that are specific to vertical mergers;
+ provide a number of examples to provide more clarity about the agencies’ analytical methods in evaluating vertical mergers.

Many comments received from the FTC’s Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century called for additional and updated guidance on analysis of vertical mergers, as have reports from the American Bar Association’s Antitrust Section and the Antitrust Modernization Commission.

The Commission vote to publish the draft Vertical Merger Guidelines and solicit public comments was 3-0-2, with Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Rohit Chopra abstaining. Commissioner Christine S. Wilson issued a statement. Commissioners Slaughter and Chopra also issued statements. Comments on the draft guidelines can be submitted to VMG Comments, and must be received no later than Feb. 11, 2020.

Read the complete release at FTC and DOJ Announce Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines for Public Comment

Full PDF Copy of FTC and DOJ Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines

FTC-DOJ Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery

Interested in Contributing?

ComplexDiscovery regularly reports on key cyber, data, and legal discovery business spheres of interest ranging from market size and mergers to business confidence and vendor developments.

We do not offer ads on the website but like to support our work with voluntary contributions from those who enjoy and benefit from the research, news, and articles shared. Your support is greatly appreciated and will be directly used to support our publishing efforts for our dynamic community of cyber, data, and legal discovery professionals.

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights cyber, data and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by business, information technology, and legal professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding cyber, data and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of cyber, data and legal discovery organizations. Registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world, ComplexDiscovery OÜ operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

Embracing Differences? Interplay of Digital Forensics in eDiscovery
Incidental Growth? Cost of a Data Breach Hits Record High According to New Report
Keeping Cyber Threats At Bay? Cyber Insurance Start Up At-Bay Closes Series D Financing
An Economical Impact? How Cyber Insurance Shapes Incident Response
Cobra Legal Solutions Acquires Digital Discovery

According to Candice Corby, Chief Executive Officer for Cobra Legal Solutions,...

TransPerfect and Semantix Merge

According to TransPerfect President and CEO Phil Shawe, “We have competed...

Braintrace Acquired by Sophos

According to Bret Laughlin, CEO and co-founder of Braintrace, “NDR is...

DISCO Announces IPO Pricing

A registration statement relating to the initial public offering by DISCO...

A New Era in eDiscovery? Framing Market Growth Through the Lens of Six Eras

There are many excellent resources for considering chronological and historiographical approaches...

An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2020-2025 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

While the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for worldwide eDiscovery software...

Resetting the Baseline? eDiscovery Market Size Adjustments for 2020

An unanticipated pandemeconomic-driven retraction in eDiscovery spending during 2020 has resulted...

Home or Away? New eDiscovery Collection Market Sizing and Pricing Considerations

One of the key home (onsite) or away (remote) decisions that...

Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for July 2021

From considerations for cyber insurance and malware to eDiscovery business confidence...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for June 2021

From remediating cyberattacks to eDiscovery pricing, the June 2021 edition of...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for May 2021

From cyber discovery and data breaches to business of law and...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for April 2021

From X-Road® and risk management to business confidence and cybersecurity, the...

Glowing Expectations? Eighteen Observations on eDiscovery Business Confidence in the Summer of 2021

In the summer of 2021, 63.3% of survey respondents felt that...

Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Summer 2021 Overview

In the summer of 2021, 24.4% of respondents viewed increasing types...

Looking Up? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Summer of 2021

In the summer of 2021, 80 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey participants...

Extreme Heat? Summer 2021 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey Results

Since January 2016, 2,522 individual responses to twenty-three quarterly eDiscovery Business...