Editor’s Note: On January 10, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division released a draft of the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines for public comment. Designed to reflect the evolution of policy since the issuance of the 1984 Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines, the complete release announcing the draft guidelines and a full copy of the proposed guidelines are provided for your consideration.
Press Announcement from the FTC and DOJ
FTC and DOJ Announce Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines for Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division seek public comment on draft 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines. The draft guidelines, open to comment for 30 days, describe how the federal antitrust agencies review vertical mergers to evaluate whether the mergers violate antitrust law. Vertical mergers combine two or more companies that operate at different levels in the same supply chain. The draft guidelines outline the agencies’ principal analytical techniques, practices, and enforcement policy for vertical mergers.
The agencies will review and consider the public comments before issuing final Vertical Merger Guidelines. The agencies cooperated closely in preparing the draft guidelines, which reflect the agencies’ significant experience in analyzing vertical mergers. The guidelines are intended to assist the business community and antitrust practitioners by providing transparency about the agencies’ antitrust enforcement policy with respect to vertical mergers.
“Challenging anticompetitive vertical mergers is essential to vigorous enforcement. The agencies’ vertical merger policy has evolved substantially since the issuance of the 1984 Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines, and our guidelines should reflect the current enforcement approach. Greater transparency about the complex issues surrounding vertical mergers will benefit the business community, practitioners, and the courts,” said FTC Chairman Joseph J. Simons. “We invite comments from all stakeholders to help ensure that the guidelines clearly and accurately convey the agencies’ antitrust enforcement policy with respect to vertical mergers.”
“While many vertical mergers are competitively beneficial or neutral, both the Department and the Federal Trade Commission have recognized for over 25 years that some vertical transactions can raise serious concern,” said Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “The revised draft guidelines are based on new economic understandings and the agencies’ experience over the past several decades and better reflect the agencies’ actual practice in evaluating proposed vertical mergers. Once finalized, the Vertical Merger Guidelines will provide more clarity and transparency on how we review vertical transactions. I look forward to receiving comments on these draft guidelines and working with the Federal Trade Commission in finalizing them.”
“I appreciate the Antitrust Division working to update this decades-old statement regarding the practices and policies of the federal enforcement agencies in this critical area, in coordination with the Federal Trade Commission,” said Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen. “As this effort demonstrates, the Department of Justice is committed to principled and transparent antitrust enforcement, which promotes free enterprise, market competition, and ultimately the welfare of American consumers. We look forward to public input and finalizing this important work, along with the FTC.”
The draft guidelines adopt the principles and analytical frameworks in the agencies’ Horizontal Merger Guidelines, including market definition, the analytic framework for evaluating entry considerations, the treatment of the acquisition of a failing firm or its assets, and the acquisition of a partial ownership interest. The draft guidelines describe the analytical and enforcement considerations that are specific to vertical mergers.
The draft guidelines:
+ describe potential anticompetitive effects resulting from vertical mergers, which may include both unilateral and coordinated effects;
+ identify foreclosure and raising rivals’ costs and access to competitively sensitive information as potential elements of antitrust harm under unilateral effects;
+ describe an analytic framework for analyzing potential anticompetitive effects of foreclosure and raising rivals’ costs;
+ discuss how the elimination of double marginalization may mitigate or completely neutralize the potential anticompetitive effects of vertical mergers;
+ discuss cognizable merger efficiencies that are specific to vertical mergers;
+ provide a number of examples to provide more clarity about the agencies’ analytical methods in evaluating vertical mergers.
Many comments received from the FTC’s Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century called for additional and updated guidance on analysis of vertical mergers, as have reports from the American Bar Association’s Antitrust Section and the Antitrust Modernization Commission.
The Commission vote to publish the draft Vertical Merger Guidelines and solicit public comments was 3-0-2, with Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Rohit Chopra abstaining. Commissioner Christine S. Wilson issued a statement. Commissioners Slaughter and Chopra also issued statements. Comments on the draft guidelines can be submitted to VMG Comments, and must be received no later than Feb. 11, 2020.
Full PDF Copy of FTC and DOJ Draft Vertical Merger GuidelinesFTC-DOJ Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines
- Considering Second Requests? The Requirement, Task, and Prevalence
- Say Again? The HSR Act and the Premerger Notification Program