Say Again? The HSR Act and the Premerger Notification Program

While the percentage of transactions in which a Second Request was issued by either the FTC or DOJ was only 2.7% in 2015, 3.0% in 2016, and 2.6% in 2017, organizations engaged in merger and acquisition activities, either directly from a participatory position or indirectly from a supporting position, should proactively prepare to support the potential for a Second Request given the short deadlines and potential voluminous information requests that may require extensive use of data discovery and electronic discovery technologies and experts to ensure compliance with requests.

Commonly referred to as the HSR Act, the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 was adopted as a way to provide the federal government with a formal process in which to help avoid anti-competitive outcomes during the course of mergers and acquisitions. The HSR Act requires that before consummating a proposed acquisition, the parties to the merger or acquisition notify the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) and wait a specific period of time while the agencies review the proposed transaction. The review process is administered and managed as part of the Federal Premerger Notification Program with the goal of avoiding some the difficulties and expenses that the enforcement agencies may encounter if potential impediments to competitive relevant markets are identified.

The Federal Premerger Notification Program

The Premerger Notification Program provides the FTC and the DOJ with information about large mergers and acquisitions before they occur. The program is administered by the FTC and supported by the Premerger Notification Office. Under the program parties to certain proposed transactions must submit a premerger notification to the FTC and DOJ. Premerger notification involves completing and filing an HSR Form, also called a “Notification and Report Form for Certain Mergers and Acquisitions,” with information about each company’s business. After filing the HSR Form, parties typically must wait 30 days (15 days in the case of a cash tender offer or bankruptcy sale) while the FTC and DOJ complete their review of the proposed transaction. The parties may not close their deal until the waiting period has passed or the government has granted early termination of the waiting period. However, if either the FTC or DOJ determines that further inquiry is necessary, they may request additional information and documentary materials. This further inquiry is commonly referred to as a Second Request.

The Second Request Process

A Second Request is a discovery procedure used by the FTC and DOJ to investigate mergers and acquisitions that warrant further investigation regarding the potential impact on competitive relevant markets. The Second Request consists of the formal request for additional information and documentary material and generally follows the framework highlighted in the Model Request for Additional Documentary Material (Second Request), published by the FTC Premerger Notification Office.

Model Request for Additional Information and Documentary Material – May 2019

A Second Request extends the waiting period for a specified time frame, typically 30 days (10 days in the case of a cash tender offer or bankruptcy sale), after required parties have complied with the additional request for information. The additional time provides the reviewing agency with the opportunity to analyze the additionally requested information and take appropriate action if required before the transaction is consummated. If the reviewing agency believes that a proposed transaction may violate the antitrust laws, it may seek an injunction in federal district court to prohibit consummation of the transaction. Once Second Requests are made, a staff attorney from the evaluating agency is usually assigned to manage the request and those parties involved in the Second Request can expect to hear directly from the agency requesting the information on the status of the investigation.

The Bureau of Competition Production Guide

Designed as an eDiscovery resource to help explain what the FTC Bureau of Competition generally requires when they send a formal request for additional information, the BC Production Guide shares suggested formats that both help to organize submissions and minimize the chance of incompatibility with processes and systems.

Bureau of Competition Production Guide - August 2015

Small Percentages. Short Timelines. Proactive Planning.

While the percentage of transactions in which a Second Request was issued by either the FTC or DOJ was only 2.7% in 2015, 3.0% in 2016, and 2.6% in 2017, organizations engaged in merger and acquisition activities, either directly from a participatory position or indirectly from a supporting position, should proactively prepare to support the potential for a Second Request given the short deadlines and potential voluminous information requests that may require extensive use of data discovery and electronic discovery technologies and experts to ensure compliance with requests.

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery

A Matter of Pricing? A Running Update of Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Survey Responses

First administered in December of 2018 and conducted four times during the last two years with 334 individual responses, the semi-annual eDiscovery Pricing Survey highlights pricing on selected collection, processing, and review tasks. The aggregate results of all surveys as shared in the provided comparative charts may be helpful for understanding pricing and its impact on purchasing behavior on selected services over time.



Access the Results Now!

ComplexDiscovery combines original industry research with curated expert articles to create an informational resource that helps legal, business, and information technology professionals better understand the business and practice of data discovery and legal discovery.

All contributions are invested to support the development and distribution of ComplexDiscovery content. Contributors can make as many article contributions as they like, but will not be asked to register and pay until their contribution reaches $5.

A Pillar of Empowerment? Evaluating and Reviewing GDPR Data Protection

The general view is that two years after it started to...

Connecting the Dots: Considering eDiscovery from Initiators to Ecosystem

From a macro perspective, connecting the dots in eDiscovery is to...

XDD Acquires RVM

According to XDD CEO Bob Polus, “Merging forces with RVM further...

Ipro Acquires NetGovern

According to Dean Brown, CEO at Ipro Tech, “We are thrilled...

A Running List: Top 100+ eDiscovery Providers

Based on a compilation of research from analyst firms and industry...

The eDisclosure Systems Buyers Guide – 2020 Edition (Andrew Haslam)

Authored by industry expert Andrew Haslam, the eDisclosure Buyers Guide continues...

The Race to the Starting Line? Recent Secure Remote Review Announcements

Not all secure remote review offerings are equal as the apparent...

Enabling Remote eDiscovery? A Snapshot of DaaS

Desktop as a Service (DaaS) providers are becoming important contributors to...

Home or Away? New eDiscovery Collection Market Sizing and Pricing Considerations

One of the key home (onsite) or away (remote) decisions that...

Revisions and Decisions? New Considerations for eDiscovery Secure Remote Reviews

One of the key revision and decision areas that business, legal,...

A Macro Look at Past and Projected eDiscovery Market Size from 2012 to 2024

From a macro look at past estimations of eDiscovery market size...

An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2019-2024 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

While the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for worldwide eDiscovery software...

A Matter of Pricing? A Running Update of Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Survey Responses

First administered in December of 2018 and conducted four times during...

A Pandemeconomic Indicator? Summer 2020 eDiscovery Pricing Survey Results

Based on the complexity of data and legal discovery, it is...

COVID-19 Constrained? The Impact of Six Issues on the Business of eDiscovery

In the spring of 2020, 51.2% of respondents viewed budgetary constraints...

A Cause to Pause? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Spring of 2020

In the spring of 2020, 150 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey participants...

XDD Acquires RVM

According to XDD CEO Bob Polus, “Merging forces with RVM further...

Ipro Acquires NetGovern

According to Dean Brown, CEO at Ipro Tech, “We are thrilled...

Morae Acquires Legal Management Consultancy Janders Dean

According to Janders Dean founder Justin North, "Now more than ever,...

eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in Q2 2020

From UnitedLex to Onna, ComplexDiscovery findings, data points, and tracking information...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for June 2020

From collection market size updates to cloud outsourcing guidelines, the June...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for May 2020

From review market sizing revisions to pandemeconomic pricing, the May 2020...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for April 2020

From business confidence to the boom of Zoom, the April 2020...

Five Great Reads on Data Discovery and Legal Discovery for March 2020

From business continuity considerations to cybersecurity attacks, the March 2020 edition...