Editor’s Note: Eastern Europe is emerging as a quiet leader in public-sector AI transformation. While global headlines focus on U.S.-China competition, the 2025 Government AI Readiness Index from Oxford Insights reveals a deeper shift: governments moving from strategic ambition to operational deployment. Estonia’s AI Leap, Ukraine’s battlefield-driven innovation, and Albania’s AI-enabled Parliament showcase how the region is rewriting the rules on governance, compliance, and talent development. For professionals working in cybersecurity, information governance, and regulatory strategy, this shift isn’t theoretical—it’s shaping the next generation of policy, infrastructure, and legal standards.
Content Assessment: Government AI Readiness Index 2025: Eastern Europe's Quiet Rise
Information - 92%
Insight - 91%
Relevance - 91%
Objectivity - 93%
Authority - 94%
92%
Excellent
A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit expressed as a percentage of positive reception of the recent article from ComplexDiscovery OÜ titled, "Government AI Readiness Index 2025: Eastern Europe's Quiet Rise."
Industry – Artificial Intelligence Beat
Government AI Readiness Index 2025: Eastern Europe’s Quiet Rise
ComplexDiscovery Staff
Governments are racing to harness artificial intelligence, but the smartest players know the scoreboard has quietly changed. In the 2025 Government AI Readiness Index, produced by Oxford Insights, the question isn’t who can deploy chatbots fastest—but which states can turn AI into a durable public benefit. While North America and China dominate headlines, Eastern Europe is quietly becoming a proving ground for AI governance—offering insights for technologists, policymakers, and risk professionals alike.
Now in its eighth year, the index shifts its focus from simple implementation to real-world impact. Instead of asking how prepared a government is to deploy AI in public services, the 2025 report asks: To what extent can a government harness AI to benefit the public? That subtle reframing has far-reaching implications.
Built on 69 indicators across 14 dimensions—grouped into six pillars: Policy Capacity, Governance, AI Infrastructure, Public Sector Adoption, Development and Diffusion, and Resilience—the index provides more than a leaderboard. It tells a story about institutional capability, strategic intent, and operational follow-through.
The Global Picture
North America again tops the regional table, with an average score of 79.75, ahead of second-place Western Europe at 62.75. The United States ranks first overall with a score of 87.20, driven by frontier labs, a dense venture ecosystem, and dominant compute infrastructure. Canada ranks 11th with a score of 72.30, bolstered by its long-standing Pan-Canadian AI Strategy and renewed focus on public sector adoption.
But global leadership is no longer a single-lane race. China, now ranked sixth—up from 23rd in 2024—is the clearest signal of this shift. In 2024, China’s research output matched the combined publications of the US, UK, and EU, with 156 institutions each producing at least 50 AI papers. Its models, like DeepSeek and Alibaba’s Qwen, demonstrate competitive performance at lower development costs—challenging assumptions that only massive GPU clusters can lead.
Underpinning this progress is a maturing sovereign stack: Huawei’s Ascend chips, SMIC’s advances in fabrication, and over $140 billion in state investment through the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund. For security teams and compliance professionals, these developments reshape global supply-chain dynamics and legal risk exposures.
Yet the index highlights one major caveat: measuring China’s readiness externally remains difficult. Limited transparency and self-contained platforms mean China’s actual capabilities may exceed what its published score reflects. In key areas, the gap between the US and China may already be narrower than assumed.
Eastern Europe: From Strategy to Action
Beyond the headline competition, Eastern Europe is quietly building a compelling case study in policy execution. The region ranks third globally, with an average score of 53.76, ahead of the global mean and trailing only North America and Western Europe.
The region’s strengths lie in Governance and Public Sector Adoption, where governments have enacted clear AI principles and begun integrating AI into services. While it still lags in Development, Diffusion, and AI Infrastructure—reflecting a lack of deep compute capacity—those constraints haven’t slowed ambition or experimentation.
Estonia remains the regional leader, ranking 19th globally with a score of 68.96. In September 2025, it launched AI Leap, a national initiative to integrate AI into secondary education. Targeting 20,000 students and 3,000 teachers, the program embeds AI literacy directly into the curriculum, creating a future-ready workforce from the ground up.
This echoes Estonia’s 1990s Tiger Leap, which laid the foundations for its globally admired e-governance infrastructure. But AI Leap marks a new phase: one focused on talent, systemic capability, and long-term resilience.
Lithuania, ranking 29th globally, continues its rise. Across the region, countries are not just publishing AI strategies—they’re executing them. Croatia unveiled its national AI plan for 2026–2028. Albania announced its first-ever AI strategy. Ukraine, even amid military conflict, launched a bold national strategy to join the global AI Top 3 by 2030.
Ukraine’s case is particularly striking. In April 2025, the Ministry of Digital Transformation opened the WINWIN AI Centre of Excellence, a national testbed for AI applications in defense, cybersecurity, healthcare, and public services. The country is also integrating AI into battlefield systems—from drones to combat logistics—while building civilian AI governance frameworks in parallel. The dual-use nature of this effort offers valuable insight into how national security, regulation, and evidence standards might co-evolve.
Poland, ranking 24th, exemplifies another regional theme: strong policy matched by steady adoption. Serbia, as Central European Initiative president, hosted a regional AI ministerial in May 2025. The Central and Eastern European AI Action Plan, launched in June at the EU Digital Summit in Gdańsk, aims to position the region as Europe’s AI hub.
Albania’s Unusual Experiment
Perhaps the most unconventional development came from Albania. In 2025, Prime Minister Edi Rama introduced the country’s first fully virtual AI Minister. Beyond the headlines, the system delivered: 83 AI assistants are now active across Parliament, supporting legislative drafting, summarizing briefs, and managing communications.
This reversal of the typical policy-tech relationship—government as AI user before regulator—created a high-stakes testing environment. When lawmakers rely on AI, the margin for error shrinks, and the demand for transparency, traceability, and responsible deployment becomes immediate. That feedback loop is already informing Albania’s policy posture, setting an example for others navigating AI governance under pressure.
Regional Cooperation and Shared Infrastructure
Eastern Europe’s momentum isn’t occurring in isolation. Countries are tightly connected to Western Europe through the EU framework and increasingly plugged into continental infrastructure. Moldova joined the EU’s EuroHPC Joint Undertaking in 2025, gaining access to shared supercomputing capacity. Serbia is deepening digital collaboration while aligning policy with international governance frameworks. Croatia is aligning its national timeline with the EU AI Act.
These linkages reduce fragmentation, promote interoperability, and accelerate adoption of shared standards. But they also raise the bar: when one country tightens its compliance protocols, others often follow quickly. For organizations operating across European jurisdictions, that means change can cascade fast.
What Readiness Looks Like Now
Early AI adoption was about vision, infrastructure, and big announcements. But maturity requires a different test: Can a government implement policy, develop local talent, and sustain cross-border partnerships over time? Can it integrate AI into public services—education, healthcare, defense, lawmaking—while maintaining public trust and legal oversight?
In 2025, Eastern Europe is showing that, for many governments, the answer is yes. Through initiatives like Estonia’s AI Leap, Ukraine’s WINWIN Centre, Albania’s AI-enabled Parliament, and Poland’s policy engine, the region is translating strategy into results.
They’re not waiting for a global rulebook. They’re writing their own.
News Source
- Government AI Readiness Index 2025 (Oxford Insights)
- Analysis based on ‘Government AI Readiness Index 2025’, Oxford Insights, licensed under CC BY‑SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Adapted for summary.
Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies
Additional Reading
- Trump’s AI Executive Order Reshapes State-Federal Power in Tech Regulation
- From Brand Guidelines to Brand Guardrails: Leadership’s New AI Responsibility
- The Agentic State: A Global Framework for Secure and Accountable AI-Powered Government
- Cyberocracy and the Efficiency Paradox: Why Democratic Design is the Smartest AI Strategy for Government
- The European Union’s Strategic AI Shift: Fostering Sovereignty and Innovation
Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ

ComplexDiscovery’s mission is to enable clarity for complex decisions by providing independent, data‑driven reporting, research, and commentary that make digital risk, legal technology, and regulatory change more legible for practitioners, policymakers, and business leaders.






























