The use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) has been accepted in the courts for several years, but most lawyers still don’t use it and many still don’t know what it is or how it works. Why not? Are the terms TAR and predictive coding synonymous or are there other forms of TAR that can also facilitate review? This CLE-approved webcast session will discuss what TAR really is, when it may be appropriate to consider for your case, what challenges can impact the use of TAR and how to get started.
This CLE-approved webcast session takes a look at the history of the development of standards and highlights specific issues of importance regarding eDiscovery in criminal matters.
This CLE-approved webcast session will cover how data privacy requirements have evolved over time, the parameters associated with the GDPR, what they mean to your organization and what steps your organization needs to take to ensure compliance with the GDPR.
This CLE-approved webcast covers 2017 case law decisions covered by the eDiscovery Daily blog and what the legal profession can learn from those rulings.
This CLE-approved webcast discusses examples of recent eDiscovery disasters and highlights the common characteristics of those disasters.
The recent eDiscovery failures at Wells Fargo and at the Department of Justice show that eDiscovery mistakes and failures happen even at the largest corporations and government agencies. This CLE-approved webcast will discuss the various issues that occurred in these high-profile cases and what to do to avoid them in your own cases.
The first days after a complaint is filed are critical to managing the eDiscovery requirements of the case efficiently and cost-effectively. With a scheduling order required within 120 days of the complaint and a Rule 26(f) “meet and confer” conference required at least 21 days before that, there’s a lot to do and a short time to do it. Where do you begin? This CLE-approved webcast will discuss the various issues to consider and decisions to be made to help you meet your discovery obligations in an efficient and proportional manner.
Today, when consumers are considering their eDiscovery technology choices, there are more factors to consider than ever. In addition to considering the functionality of the software application, you now also have to consider whether to buy or “rent” the application, how the software is delivered to you and whether it’s required to be within your firewall or can be an off-premises solution. This CLE-approved webcast session discusses different on-premise and off-premise eDiscovery solution options and considerations for each.
The best predictor of future behavior is relevant past behavior. Nowhere is that truer than with legal precedents set by past case law decisions, especially when it relates to eDiscovery best practices. This CLE-approved* webcast session will cover key case law covered by the eDiscovery Daily Blog during the first half of 2017.
Until recently, state of the art eDiscovery technology was only available to the largest law firms and corporations. Smaller firms and organizations were essentially priced out of the market and couldn’t afford the solutions that could be used by the “big boys” to manage their discovery workloads. Times have changed – thanks to cloud-based, software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) automated solutions that have made full-featured eDiscovery solutions affordable for even small and solo firms. This webcast will discuss how SaaS automation technology has revolutionized eDiscovery for solo and small firms today.