Mon. Apr 22nd, 2024

Content Assessment: Redefining Copyrights: The New York Times Takes on AI Giants in Landmark Suit

Information - 93%
Insight - 94%
Relevance - 92%
Objectivity - 91%
Authority - 90%



A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit expressed as a percentage of positive reception of the recent article titled, "Redefining Copyrights: The New York Times Takes on AI Giants in Landmark Suit" from the staff at ComplexDiscovery OÜ.

Editor’s Note: This new article highlights a pivotal development for copyright law and the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence industry. The New York Times (NYT) has launched a significant lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI. This case, filed in a Manhattan Federal court, potentially redefines copyright law’s contours and the role of artificial intelligence in content creation. Central to the NYT’s allegations is that Microsoft and OpenAI have used millions of their articles without authorization to train their generative AI products, such as ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, seeking billions in damages.

The implications of this lawsuit extend into the domain of eDiscovery. The case brings critical questions about the sourcing and utilization of data by AI technologies, particularly in the context of legal compliance and discovery processes. If the NYT’s claims are upheld, it could lead to a stringent reevaluation of how AI systems are trained, especially regarding using copyrighted material. This could have far-reaching consequences for eDiscovery professionals, who increasingly rely on AI for data analysis and retrieval in legal proceedings.

Industry News

Redefining Copyrights: The New York Times Takes on AI Giants in Landmark Suit

ComplexDiscovery Staff

In a move that pits traditional journalism against the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence, The New York Times (NYT) has initiated legal proceedings against tech titans Microsoft and OpenAI, setting the stage for a legal showdown that could reshape the boundaries of copyright law and AI’s role in content creation. The lawsuit filed in a Manhattan Federal court claims billions of dollars in damages, asserting that both companies have utilized millions of NYT articles without permission to train their generative AI products, which include ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot.

The litigation follows earlier legal actions by other content creators, including prominent U.S. authors like George R.R. Martin and Sarah Silverman, who accuse AI developers of copyright infringement on a massive scale. Adding to the stakes, Silicon Valley powerhouse Sam Altman’s OpenAI, valued at $100B and backed by a significant investment from Microsoft, finds itself at the heart of these ethical and copyright challenges as it battles to defend its fair use position in court.

While OpenAI has argued that the use of copyrighted material is protected by fair use in U.S. law, The Times pursues to bring accountability to AI companies for free-riding on the journalistic efforts of media organizations. The case focuses on the AI methods’ reliance on copyrighted content to create products that cut into the profits and audiences of established outlets, such as NYT. Not only does The Times demand financial compensation, but it also seeks the destruction of the models and training sets that incorporated their works.

Tech firms have taken note of the legal landscape, with companies like Bloomberg and Adobe amassing their data, poised to forge their path in the AI domain. Conversely, Apple and Axel Springer have opted for ethical approaches, embarking on upfront negotiations for data usage. At the same time, OpenAI has established partnerships with publishers like Axel Springer to use content from Politico and other outlets in ChatGPT’s responses. Yet, the partnership that NYT sought with OpenAI was not reached.

This burgeoning nexus between journalism and artificial intelligence not only drives a conversation about the future of fair use and copyright laws but also spotlights the potential innovation that generative AI technologies bring to creative fields. Ryan Abbott, an attorney at Brown Neri Smith & Khan, underscores the judicial uncertainty surrounding AI, where courts have yet to determine the application of fair use doctrine to AI tools. His perspective hints at a legal quagmire that could take years to resolve, casting a long shadow over the rapid advancements in AI technology.

The outcome of this landmark case is poised to impact companies across the AI landscape, including mid-tier firms like Midjourney, while setting a critical precedent that would guide the use of copyrighted material in AI training. Financial research firm Evercore ISI prognosticates AI copyright disputes as growth opportunities, suggesting that the resolution to such cases might likely result in lucrative AI licensing deals for media companies.

The NYT lawsuit marks a pivotal point in the conversation about ethical AI with implications that stretch beyond the courtroom and into the evolution of content distribution and access. As AI-generated content continues to proliferate, the lines between original and derivative works become increasingly blurred, prompting a re-examination of the tenets of creativity and copyright protection in the digital age. The stakes are high, and the call for a balanced approach between innovation and the originality of content has never been more urgent.

The ongoing debate around the rapid growth of artificial intelligence, underscored by the legal battle involving The New York Times, Microsoft, and OpenAI, brings to light serious concerns about its potential impact on the financial stability and intellectual freedom of content creators. These worries highlight the urgent need for a carefully balanced approach to the evolution of AI technologies, emphasizing the protection of creators’ interests in the wake of such high-profile legal confrontations.

At the same time, organizations holding significant proprietary data are uniquely positioned to influence the trajectory of the AI industry in response to these legal challenges. They have a crucial role in setting standards and guiding the development of AI, ensuring that it progresses in a way that respects both innovation and creators’ rights. Their response to the challenges posed by this legal scenario is crucial in shaping a future for AI that harmoniously blends technological advancement with the preservation of intellectual property and artistic integrity.

This landmark suit could significantly impact the field of legal technology and eDiscovery, altering the way AI tools are integrated and utilized within legal processes.

News Sources

Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery


Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know, and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a highly recognized digital publication focused on providing detailed insights into the fields of cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery. Based in Estonia, a hub for digital innovation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ upholds rigorous standards in journalistic integrity, delivering nuanced analyses of global trends, technology advancements, and the eDiscovery sector. The publication expertly connects intricate legal technology issues with the broader narrative of international business and current events, offering its readership invaluable insights for informed decision-making.

For the latest in law, technology, and business, visit


Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use

ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and DALL-E, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).

ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.