Sun. Sep 25th, 2022
    en flag
    nl flag
    fr flag
    de flag
    pt flag
    es flag

    Editor’s Note: Designed to help provide a general understanding of predictive coding use by eDiscovery professionals, the semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey has been conducted three times by ComplexDiscovery and has 171 individual respondent submissions since the fall of 2018. One of the informational areas contained in the survey is the request for respondents to share their primary predictive coding platform. Provided in this short overview are the aggregate results of that informational request across all surveys.

    The Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey

    The Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey is a non-scientific semi-annual survey designed to help provide a general understanding of the use of predictive coding technologies, protocols, and workflows by data discovery and legal discovery professionals within the eDiscovery ecosystem. The survey offers responders an opportunity to provide predictive coding background information, including their primary predictive coding platform, as well as poses four specific questions to responders. Those questions being:

    • Which predictive coding technologies are utilized by your eDiscovery platform?
    • Which technology-assisted review protocols are utilized in your delivery of predictive coding?
    • What is the primary technology-assisted review workflow utilized in your delivery of predictive coding?
    • What are the areas where you use technology-assisted review technologies, protocols, and workflows?

    Initiated in the fall of 2018, to date the survey has been administered three times with 171 individual respondents. The survey is open to legal, business, and information professionals operating in the eDiscovery ecosystem and individuals are invited to participate primarily by direct email invitations.

    A Short List of Primary Coding Platforms

    Based on the aggregate results of the past three surveys, the following overview highlights responses to the informational request regarding primary predictive coding platform as well as highlights the organizational affiliations of survey respondents. While the informational request on primary predictive coding platforms was designed to gather feedback on one primary predictive coding platform provider per respondent, some respondents provided more than one answer to the request, hence the higher number of responses than respondents in the aggregate results.

    Ten Top Primary Predictive Coding Platforms

    Provided below (Chart 1) is an overview of the predictive coding platforms receiving the most responses from an aggregate survey group of 171 respondents who shared 183 responses. The chart highlights the top ten platforms based on received responses.

    Chart 1: Top Ten Predictive Coding Platforms Based on Survey Responses

    Primary Predictive Coding Platform Overview – Ten Top Platforms

    An Aggregate Alphabetical Listing of All Reported Primary Predictive Coding Platforms

    Provided below is an alphabetical listing of all predictive coding platforms reported at least once as a primary platform. In some areas where acquisitions have occurred, the latest commercial name of the provider/platform may be represented.

    • AccessData (Summation)
    • AI Translate (Linguistics Systems)
    • Ayfie
    • Brainspace
    • CaseData (Canon Discovery Services)
    • Computer Associates
    • Conduent (Viewpoint)
    • Disco
    • Everlaw
    • Exterro
    • Goldfynch
    • Hot Neuron (Clustify)
    • iCONECT (Sentio)
    • Ipro (Eclipse)
    • KLDiscovery (KLD Predictive Coding)
    • Lexbe eDiscovery Platform
    • Lighthouse
    • Logikcull
    • Merlin Digital Magic
    • NexLP
    • Nuix
    • Microsoft (Equivio)
    • Microsoft (Office 365 Advanced Discovery)
    • OpenText (Axcelerate)
    • OpenText (Insight Predict)
    • Orca Intelligent Review
    • Platinum IDS (Cullable)
    • Proprietary
    • Proprietary (CAL)
    • Proprietary (Relationship Maps)
    • Rational Review
    • Relativity
    • Servient
    • TensorFlow
    • Thomson Reuters (eDiscovery Point)
    • Valora Tech (Powerhouse)
    • Venio Assisted Review
    • Veritas

    An Overview of Responder Roles

    Provided below (Chart 2) is an overview of the number of responders for each survey and the aggregate of all surveys based on declared organizational affiliation from one of six presented survey organizational affiliation choices.

    Chart 2: Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey Responder Overview

    Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey Responder Overview

    Additional Reading

    Source: ComplexDiscovery

     

    Have a Request?

    If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

    ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights cyber, data, and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding cyber, data, and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

    ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of cyber, data, and legal discovery organizations. Focused primarily on supporting the ComplexDiscovery publication, the company is registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world. The company operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

    Leaning Forward? The CISA 2023-2025 Strategic Plan

    The purpose of the CISA Strategic Plan is to communicate the...

    Continuous Risk Improvement? Q3 Cyber Round-Up From Cowbell Cyber

    According to Manu Singh, director of risk engineering at Cowbell, "Every...

    A Comprehensive Cyber Discovery Resource? The DoD Cybersecurity Policy Chart from CSIAC

    The Cyber Security and Information Systems Information Analysis Center (CSIAC) is...

    Rapidly Evolving Cyber Insurance? Q2 Cyber Round-Up From Cowbell Cyber

    According to Isabelle Dumont, SVP of Marketing and Technology Partners at...

    Revealing Response? Nuix Responds to ASX Request for Information

    The following investor news update from Nuix shares a written response...

    Revealing Reports? Nuix Notes Press Speculation

    According to a September 9, 2022 market release from Nuix, the...

    Regards to Broadway? HaystackID® Acquires Business Intelligence Associates

    According to HaystackID CEO Hal Brooks, “BIA is a leader in...

    One Large Software and Cloud Business? OpenText to Acquire Micro Focus

    According to OpenText CEO & CTO Mark J. Barrenechea, “We are...

    On the Move? 2022 eDiscovery Market Kinetics: Five Areas of Interest

    Recently ComplexDiscovery was provided an opportunity to share with the eDiscovery...

    Trusting the Process? 2021 eDiscovery Processing Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    The Year in Review? 2021 eDiscovery Review Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    A 2021 Look at eDiscovery Collection: Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for September 2022

    From privacy legislation and special masters to acquisitions and investigations, the...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for August 2022

    From AI and Big Data challenges to intriguing financial and investment...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for July 2022

    From lurking business undercurrents to captivating deepfake developments, the July 2022...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for June 2022

    From eDiscovery ecosystem players and pricing to data breach investigations and...

    Cooler Temperatures? Fall 2022 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey Results

    Since January 2016, 2,874 individual responses to twenty-eight quarterly eDiscovery Business...

    Inflection or Deflection? An Aggregate Overview of Eight Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Surveys

    Initiated in the winter of 2019 and conducted eight times with...

    Changing Currents? Eighteen Observations on eDiscovery Business Confidence in the Summer of 2022

    In the summer of 2022, 54.8% of survey respondents felt that...

    Challenging Variants? Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Summer 2022 Overview

    In the summer of 2022, 28.8% of respondents viewed increasing types...

    Nuclear Options? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (September 17 – 21, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Mass Graves and Torture Chambers? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (September 12 – 16, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    On The Run? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (September 7 – 11, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Tangible Degradation? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (September 2 – 6, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...