Sat. Jan 29th, 2022
    en flag
    nl flag
    et flag
    fi flag
    fr flag
    de flag
    he flag
    ja flag
    lv flag
    pl flag
    pt flag
    ru flag
    es flag

    Content Assessment: Federal Trade Commission Withdraws Vertical Merger Guidelines and Commentary

    Information - 90%
    Insight - 95%
    Relevance - 90%
    Objectivity - 90%
    Authority - 100%

    93%

    Excellent

    A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit of the recent FTC announcement regarding vertical merger guidelines.

    Editor’s Note: From time to time, ComplexDiscovery highlights publicly available or privately purchasable announcements, content updates, and research from cyber, data, and legal discovery providers, research organizations, and ComplexDiscovery community members. While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions.

    To submit recommendations for consideration and inclusion in ComplexDiscovery’s cyber, data, and legal discovery-centric service, product, or research announcements, contact us today.


    Press Announcement*

    Federal Trade Commission Withdraws Vertical Merger Guidelines and Commentary

    2020 guidance withdrawn to prevent industry and judicial reliance on unsound economic theories; FTC to work with DOJ to update merger guidance

    The Federal Trade Commission voted to withdraw its approval of the Vertical Merger Guidelines, issued jointly with the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the FTC’s Vertical Merger Commentary. The guidance documents, which were published in 2020, include unsound economic theories that are unsupported by the law or market realities. The FTC is withdrawing its approval in order to prevent industry or judicial reliance on a flawed approach. In voting to withdraw, the FTC reaffirmed its commitment to working closely with the DOJ to review and update the agencies’ merger guidance.

    The withdrawn Vertical Merger Guidelines set out analytical techniques and enforcement policies for non-horizontal mergers, while the associated commentary had summarized a selection of prior investigations that largely utilized that framework. The guidelines noted several ways vertical mergers can harm competition, which the statement by the FTC majority recognizes provided valuable analysis.

    The statement by the FTC majority, however, notes that the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines had improperly contravened the Clayton Act’s language with its approach to efficiencies, which are not recognized by the statute as a defense to an unlawful merger. The majority statement explains that the guidelines adopted a particularly flawed economic theory regarding purported pro-competitive benefits of mergers, despite having no basis of support in the law or market reality. The majority noted that because the Vertical Merger Guidelines were adopted in 2020, they had yet to have a significant impact and that acting swiftly was paramount to preventing judicial reliance on this flawed discussion.

    Going forward, the FTC will work with the DOJ to update merger guidance to better-reflect market realities. The FTC majority statement lays out several areas for consideration in that review.  First, the FTC intends to explore ways to provide clear guidance on the characteristics of transactions that are likely unlawful. Second, the FTC will look at ways to provide guidance on ineffective remedies, based on an evaluation of past remedy practices and any evidence that past remedies may not have fully restored competition. Finally, the agency will look to expand on the harms identified in the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines to consider various features of modern firms, including in digital markets, and impacts of mergers on labor markets.

    The Commission vote to rescind the policy statement was 3-2, with the majority issuing a separate statement and Commissioners Noah Joshua Phillips and Christine S. Wilson issuing a separate dissenting statement.

     

    Have a Request?

    If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

    ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights cyber, data, and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding cyber, data, and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

    ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of cyber, data, and legal discovery organizations. Focused primarily on supporting the ComplexDiscovery publication, the company is registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world. The company operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

    Time to Assess? NIST Updates Security Control Assessment Procedures

    Security and privacy control assessments are not about checklists, simple pass/fail...

    [2021/2022 Annual Update] International Cyber Law in Practice: Interactive Toolkit

    New scenarios ranging from cyber operations against medical facilities to a...

    A Comprehensive Cyber Discovery Resource? The DoD Cybersecurity Policy Chart from CSIAC

    The Cyber Security and Information Systems Information Analysis Center (CSIAC) is...

    Business Interrupted? The 11th Edition of the Annual Allianz Risk Barometer

    According to the new report, following a year of unprecedented cyber-attacks,...

    A Nuix Update: First Half 2022 Financial Results

    Since the Trading Update at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) covering...

    Mitratech Acquires Quovant

    According to Mike Williams, CEO of Mitratech, “We are thrilled to...

    eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in 2021

    Since beginning to track the number of publicly highlighted merger, acquisition,...

    eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in Q4 2021

    From Consilio and Epiq to Driven and Innovative Discovery, the following...

    Trusting the Process? 2021 eDiscovery Processing Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    The Year in Review? 2021 eDiscovery Review Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    A 2021 Look at eDiscovery Collection: Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2021-2026 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

    From market retraction in 2020 to resurgence in 2021, the worldwide...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for January 2022

    From artificial intelligence and machine learning to business confidence and cybersecurity...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for December 2021

    From CISA cybersecurity guidance to mastering megamatters, the December 2021 edition...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for November 2021

    From worldwide eDiscovery market sizing and discovery intelligence to cybersecurity playbooks...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for October 2021

    From artificial intelligence and predictive coding to eDiscovery business confidence and...

    A Talent Trap? Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Winter 2022 Overview

    In the winter of 2022, 35.2% of respondents viewed lack of...

    Transfers in Order? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Winter of 2022

    In the winter of 2021, 43 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey participants...

    A View from the Top? Winter 2022 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey Results

    Since January 2016, 2,649 individual responses to twenty-five quarterly eDiscovery Business...

    Common Cents? An Aggregate Overview of Seven Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Surveys

    The anonymized aggregate results from seven semi-annual surveys highlight eDiscovery pricing...