Sat. Jan 29th, 2022

    Editor’s Note: The recent article, Seven Questions Lawyers Should Ask Vendors About Their AI Products, authored by Maura Grossman and Rees Morrison, provides a must-read overview of questions and considerations for lawyers to examine as they move from “asking about” artificial intelligence to “asking for it” as part of vendor products and services. 

    Seven Questions Lawyers Should Ask Vendors About Their AI Products

    An extract from an article by Maura Grossman and Rees Morrison

    The frenetic and much-touted world of artificial intelligence (AI) has poured into the legal industry like a storm surge. Lawyers who lack technical expertise or feel overwhelmed by jargon and arcane mathematical concepts are at a distinct disadvantage in this technology-oriented new world. Vendors can make assertions with little risk of cross-examination.

    If your law firm or department has invited a vendor to explain or demonstrate its AI software, you likely already know the foundational questions to ask about the vendor’s company, competitive position, pricing, support, and user base. These days, you likely also know to ask about the vendor’s data protection and data security practices. However, you are probably on less solid ground concerning the questions to ask about the underlying machine-learning software. This article proposes seven basic questions – and a framework for understanding the answers to those questions – that are specifically targeted at vendors that offer AI and machine-learning products and services.

    Question #1: What Do You Mean When You Say Your Software Uses “Artificial Intelligence” or “Machine Learning?”

    A subcategory of artificial intelligence, machine-learning software finds patterns in data, and the software improves its performance (i.e., “learns”) as it processes more data. Data can include the words in documents – such as those contained in emails in electronic discovery or in word-processing files in contract analytics – which are analyzed using natural language processing or statistical methods. Data can also include figures from time and billing systems, where regression and neural networks can provide insights. Or data may be derived from human resources files, where classification methods, such as support vector machines or decision trees, can help identify records of interest or improve the quality of predictions.

    The vendor should explain whether their software uses supervised or unsupervised learning. If supervised, your data will need labels (corresponding to classes or categories of interest, such as whether the client is a public or private company, whether the documents are privileged or not, or whether the practice group of a lawyer is corporate, litigation, or tax). In unsupervised learning, such as k-nearest neighbor classification, the software detects patterns on its own, based on the numbers in the variables.

    What you should not hear from the vendor are grand, vague assertions, or that they cannot answer your questions because their software is based on proprietary methodologies.

    Read the complete article at Seven Questions Lawyers Should Ask Vendors About Their AI Products

    Additional Reading

    Source: ComplexDiscovery

     

    Have a Request?

    If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

    ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights cyber, data, and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding cyber, data, and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

    ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of cyber, data, and legal discovery organizations. Focused primarily on supporting the ComplexDiscovery publication, the company is registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world. The company operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

    Time to Assess? NIST Updates Security Control Assessment Procedures

    Security and privacy control assessments are not about checklists, simple pass/fail...

    [2021/2022 Annual Update] International Cyber Law in Practice: Interactive Toolkit

    New scenarios ranging from cyber operations against medical facilities to a...

    A Comprehensive Cyber Discovery Resource? The DoD Cybersecurity Policy Chart from CSIAC

    The Cyber Security and Information Systems Information Analysis Center (CSIAC) is...

    Business Interrupted? The 11th Edition of the Annual Allianz Risk Barometer

    According to the new report, following a year of unprecedented cyber-attacks,...

    A Nuix Update: First Half 2022 Financial Results

    Since the Trading Update at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) covering...

    Mitratech Acquires Quovant

    According to Mike Williams, CEO of Mitratech, “We are thrilled to...

    eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in 2021

    Since beginning to track the number of publicly highlighted merger, acquisition,...

    eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in Q4 2021

    From Consilio and Epiq to Driven and Innovative Discovery, the following...

    Trusting the Process? 2021 eDiscovery Processing Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    The Year in Review? 2021 eDiscovery Review Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    A 2021 Look at eDiscovery Collection: Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2021-2026 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

    From market retraction in 2020 to resurgence in 2021, the worldwide...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for January 2022

    From artificial intelligence and machine learning to business confidence and cybersecurity...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for December 2021

    From CISA cybersecurity guidance to mastering megamatters, the December 2021 edition...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for November 2021

    From worldwide eDiscovery market sizing and discovery intelligence to cybersecurity playbooks...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for October 2021

    From artificial intelligence and predictive coding to eDiscovery business confidence and...

    A Talent Trap? Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Winter 2022 Overview

    In the winter of 2022, 35.2% of respondents viewed lack of...

    Transfers in Order? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Winter of 2022

    In the winter of 2021, 43 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey participants...

    A View from the Top? Winter 2022 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey Results

    Since January 2016, 2,649 individual responses to twenty-five quarterly eDiscovery Business...

    Common Cents? An Aggregate Overview of Seven Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Surveys

    The anonymized aggregate results from seven semi-annual surveys highlight eDiscovery pricing...