Thu. Dec 1st, 2022
    2010-2018 ARCHIVED CONTENT
    You are viewing ARCHIVED CONTENT released online from 1 April, 2010 to August 24, 2018. Content in this archive site is NOT UPDATED, and links may not function. For current information, go to ComplexDiscovery.com.

     

    Author’s Note: Expanding on the original article, Considering Third Generation Discovery? Two Approaches for Evaluating eDiscovery Offerings1, this update comprehends the expansion of design focus, capabilities, and flexibility for eDiscovery technology offerings since 2009. This is part one of a two-part update. 

    Considering Fourth Generation eDiscovery Technology

    With the many products and services available in the marketplace today, the need to be able to uniformly contrast and compare eDiscovery technologies continues to grow. Though more and more vendors are providing tools and techniques tools that can help in considering and comparing their offerings, there continues to be a need for comparison frameworks to help eDiscovery practitioners systematically evaluate the technology in available offerings.

    Two Approaches for Comparing eDiscovery Technology Offerings

    With the need for thorough and holistic comparisons mind, this article provides a high-level overview of two approaches that legal and information technology professionals may find useful as they consider eDiscovery technology.   

    The first approach, based on Geoffrey Moore’s whole product concept2, consists of taking into account all elements of a technology offering to help create a complete offering comparison. 

    The second approach, based on a generational model view of eDiscovery technology, helps individuals compare offerings’ value based on their capability, flexibility, delivery method, and security.   

    Using these approaches to consider offerings across four generations of eDiscovery technology may help legal professionals not only determine the best eDiscovery technology available but also determine the best eDiscovery technology for their particular needs.

    The Elements of a Complete Technology Offering

    Before one can actually compare technologies, one needs to understand the specific elements of a complete eDiscovery technology offering. So what is a complete technology offering? In 1991 author Geoffrey Moore introduced the whole product concept to help technology leaders develop and deliver offerings that would be considered complete in the mind’s eye of the user. This concept highlighted the fact that a whole product consists of not only a core offering but also includes additional elements that help drive the value of the core offering (Figure 1).

    Figure 1 – Example Whole Product Diagram3

    In adapting the whole product concept for electronic discovery technologies, it appears reasonable to suggest that a complete eDiscovery technology offering might consist of the following:

    Core eDiscovery Technology4 (One or More of the Following Capabilities)

    • Planning: Tasks designed to maintain the integrity of electronically stored information (ESI) and facilitate the conduct of ESI discovery throughout the litigation lifecycle.
    • Preserving: Tasks designed to keep ESI safe from danger or harm throughout the litigation lifecycle.
    • Preparing: Tasks designed to make appropriate ESI ready for examination and evaluation.
    • Reviewing: Tasks designed to examine and evaluate ESI in relation to audit, investigation or litigation objectives.
    • Sharing: Tasks designed to allow others to use appropriate ESI as part of an audit, investigation or litigation.

    Enabling Elements (Two or More of the Following Elements)

    • Hardware: The mechanical and electronic components that constitute a computer system.
    • Software: The set of instructions (programs) that cause a computer to perform one or more tasks.
    • Connectivity: The infrastructure that allows computer networks to link to people and resources.

    Complementary Elements (One or More of the Following Elements)

    • Architecture: The design of a computer system that sets the standard for all devices that connect to it and all the software that runs on it. It is based on the programs that will run and the number of programs that run concurrently.
    • Protocols: The formats and procedures that govern the transmitting and receiving of data.
    • Interfaces: The way users communicate with the computer.

    Complementary Services (One or More of the Following Services)

    • Consulting: Providing expertise and specialized advice.
    • Training: Providing users familiarization and proficiency through specialized instruction and practice.
    • Support: Providing assistance through attempting to help the users solve specific problems with an offering. 

    By understanding the elements of the whole product and applying it to eDiscovery to form a basis for a complete eDiscovery technology offering (Figure 2), one can then begin to compare uniformly and contrast eDiscovery technology offerings in a systematic and comprehensive manner.   

    Figure 2 – The Complete Discovery Technology Offering

    Another methodology that may be useful in comparing eDiscovery technology offerings is the generational model of eDiscovery technology classification.

    A Generational Model of eDiscovery Classification

    Generational models of classification are not new to technology. These models have driven discussions of such important technologies such as computers5 and wireless connectivity6.   The classification of technology generations is generally based on a new design or approach that truly changes the way the technology performs. When considering eDiscovery technologies, this same classification approach appears to be a reasonable way to consider comparisons between offerings. With design, integration, and automation attributes in mind, current eDiscovery technology offerings seem to fall into one of the four generational categories depicted in Table 1.

    Building Blocks 3

    Table 1 – Generational Look at eDiscovery Offerings

    Generational Differences in Design Focus

    In considering the differences in design focus, it appears that eDiscovery technology offerings in the marketplace today were either adapted for eDiscovery or designed for eDiscovery.   Depending on particular needs, this generational difference may or may not be important in choosing an eDiscovery offering.  However, it does appear reasonable to assert that eDiscovery offerings that were not designed specifically for eDiscovery may run the risk over time of lacking both the capability and flexibility to meet the time, cost and complexity challenges7 facing eDiscovery practitioners.

    Generational Differences in Integration Approach

    In considering the differences in integration focus, it appears that eDiscovery technology offerings in the marketplace today were also adapted for eDiscovery task integration or designed for eDiscovery task integration.  Depending on specific needs, this generational difference also may or may not be important in choosing an eDiscovery offering.  However, it also appears reasonable to assert that eDiscovery offerings that were not designed specifically for eDiscovery integration may run the risk over time of lacking both the capability and flexibility to meet the time, cost and complexity challenges facing eDiscovery practitioners.

    Generational Differences in Automation Approach

    In considering the differences in automation focus, it appears that most eDiscovery technology offerings in the marketplace today either were not designed to support task automation or have been adapted or reengineered for task automation after the initial release. However, there are recently developed offerings were designed to provide for the automation of eDiscovery tasks. These newer offerings designed for eDiscovery, task integration, and task automation appear to offer eDiscovery professionals with the best balance of capability and flexibility available for addressing the top challenges in managing eDiscovery requests. Top challenges8 that include:

    • Volume and Types of Data
    • Increasing Legal and Regulatory Requirements
    • Inadequate Technology
    • Lack of Personnel
    • Budgetary Constraints
    • Data Security

    Depending on particular needs, this generational difference may or may not be important in choosing an eDiscovery technology offering.  However, as with previous generations of eDiscovery technology offerings, it does appear reasonable to assert that eDiscovery offerings that were not designed specifically for eDiscovery automation may run the risk over time of lacking both the capability and flexibility to meet increasing time, cost and complexity challenges facing eDiscovery practitioners.

    Click here for part two of this two-part update.

    1 Robinson, W. R. (2009). Considering Third Generation eDiscovery? Two Approaches for Evaluating eDiscovery Offerings. Austin, TX: Orange Legal Technologies.

    2 Geoffrey A. Moore.  Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customer.  New York:  Harper Business, 1991, Revised 2006.

    3 Wikipedia: Whole product. (n.d.). Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://www.factbook.org/wikipedia/en/w/wh/whole_product.html

    A Basic eDiscovery Framework: One Way To Align Three Differing Approaches. (2012, November 30). Retrieved from http://www.complexdiscovery.com/info/2012/11/30/a-basic-ediscovery-framework-one-way-to-align-three-differing-approaches/

    5 The Five Generations of Computers – Webopedia. (2015, December 9). Retrieved from http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Hardware_Software/FiveGenerations.asp

    6 Generations of Wireless Communication Technology – Tutorvoice. (2015, October 11). Retrieved from https://complexdiscovery.com

    Three Decision Drivers in eDiscovery Sourcing: Cost, Time and Complexity. (2014, February 10). Retrieved from http://www.complexdiscovery.com/info/2014/02/10/three-decision-drivers-in-ediscovery-sourcing-cost-time-and-complexity/

    8 Stratifying eDiscovery: Baseline Considerations for Market Segmentation. (2015, December 4). Retrieved from http://www.complexdiscovery.com/info/2015/12/04/stratifying-ediscovery-baseline-considerations-for-market-segmentation/

     

     

    Have a Request?

    If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

    ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights cyber, data, and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding cyber, data, and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

    ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of cyber, data, and legal discovery organizations. Focused primarily on supporting the ComplexDiscovery publication, the company is registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world. The company operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

    Beyond the Perimeter? The DoD Zero Trust Strategy and Roadmap

    Current and future cyber threats and attacks drive the need for...

    Balancing Spend and Standards? Cybersecurity Investments in the European Union

    According to EU Agency for Cybersecurity Executive Director Juhan Lepassaar, “The...

    Stricter Supervisory and Enforcement Measures? European Parliament Adopts New Cybersecurity Law

    According to European Member of Parliament (MEP) Bart Groothuis, “Ransomware and...

    Geopolitical Shakedowns? The Annual ENISA Threat Landscape Report – 10th Edition

    According to EU Agency for Cybersecurity Executive Director Juhan Lepassaar, “Today's...

    A Technology-Driven Solution? Integreon Announces New Chief Executive Officer

    Subroto’s people-first leadership style combined with his passion for leveraging technology...

    A Magnet for Revenue? Magnet Forensics Announces 2022 Third Quarter Results

    According to Adam Belsher, Magnet Forensics' CEO, "Our solutions address the...

    Progress and Opportunity? Cellebrite Announces Third Quarter 2022 Results

    “We are pleased to report a solid third quarter, delivering strong...

    Fueling Continued Growth? Renovus Capital Acquires Advisory Business from HBR Consulting

    "The legal industry remains in the early stages of digital and...

    An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2022-2027 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

    From retraction to resurgence and acceleration, the worldwide market for eDiscovery...

    On the Move? 2022 eDiscovery Market Kinetics: Five Areas of Interest

    Recently ComplexDiscovery was provided an opportunity to share with the eDiscovery...

    Trusting the Process? 2021 eDiscovery Processing Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    The Year in Review? 2021 eDiscovery Review Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for November 2022

    From cyber shakedowns and threats to the total cost of eDiscovery...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for October 2022

    From cyber claims and data privacy to corporate litigation and the...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for September 2022

    From privacy legislation and special masters to acquisitions and investigations, the...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for August 2022

    From AI and Big Data challenges to intriguing financial and investment...

    Onsite or Remote? Document Reviewer Preferences Survey (Winter 2023)

    Today CompexDiscovery expands that survey portfolio by introducing a new business...

    In The House? The Fall 2022 eDiscovery Total Cost of Ownership Survey – Final Results

    Today CompexDiscovery shares the results of a new business survey focused...

    Cold Front Concerns? Eighteen Observations on eDiscovery Business Confidence in the Fall of 2022

    In the fall of 2022, 49.0% of survey respondents felt that...

    Stereotyping Data? Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Fall 2022 Overview

    In the fall of 2022, 28.0% of respondents viewed increasing types...

    The Arrival of General Winter? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 21-27, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Digging Out and Digging In? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 14-20, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    A Liberating Momentum? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 7-13, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Rhetoric or Reality? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 1-6, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...