Considering the Challenge of Cloud Forensics? A New Publication from NIST

According to NIST in its recently published paper on forensic science challenges and the cloud, “Cloud computing has revolutionized the methods by which digital data is stored, processed, and transmitted.” The paper goes on to highlight that, “One of the most daunting new challenges is how to perform digital forensics in various types of cloud computing environments. The challenges associated with conducting forensics in different cloud deployment models, which may cross geographic or legal boundaries, have become an issue.” The complete paper, NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges, published in August of 2020, aggregates, categorizes, and discusses the forensics challenges faced by experts when responding to incidents that have occurred in a cloud-computing ecosystem.

en flag
nl flag
et flag
fi flag
fr flag
de flag
pt flag
ru flag
es flag

Content Assessment: NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges

Information - 95%
Insight - 95%
Relevance - 90%
Objectivity - 90%
Authority - 100%

94%

Excellent

A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit of the recent post sharing NIST's recent publication on cloud forensics.

Editor’s Note: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently announced the publication of a paper that defines and discusses a set of challenges related to achieving effective cloud computing forensics. The paper, NISTIR 8006, NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges, notes that mitigating cloud forensic science challenges is important for cloud-based system owners, cloud forensic tool developers, forensic investigators, as well as for the development of forensic-ready solutions. According to NIST, efforts in this area will support criminal justice and civil litigation systems and provide capabilities for security incident response and internal enterprise operations.

NISTIR 8006, NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges*

Authored by Martin Hermin, Michaela Iorga, Ahsen Michael Salim, Robert Jackson, Mark Hurst, Ross Leo, Richard Lee, Nancy Landreville, Anand Kumar Mishra, Yien Wang, and Rodrigo Sardinas

Extract – Cloud Computing Forensic Science

Many experts consider forensic science to be the application of a broad spectrum of sciences and technologies to the investigation and establishment of facts of interest in relation to criminal law, civil law, or regulatory issues. The rapid advance of cloud services requires the development of better forensic tools to keep pace. However, the resulting techniques may also be used for purposes other than legal and regulatory issues to reconstruct an event that has occurred.

Cloud computing forensic science is the application of scientific principles, technological practices, and derived and proven methods to reconstruct past cloud computing events through the identification, acquisition, preservation, examination, interpretation, and reporting of potential digital evidence.

NIST defines cloud computing as a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction. This cloud model is composed of five essential characteristics, three service models, and four deployment models. Cloud forensics is a process applied to an implementation of this cloud model.

A number of researchers have defined cloud forensics as the application of digital forensic science in cloud environments. Technically, it consists of a hybrid forensic approach (e.g., remote, virtual, network, live, large-scale, thin-client, thick-client, including end-point devices used to access cloud services) to the discovery of digital evidence. Organizationally, it involves interactions among cloud Actors (i.e., Provider, Consumer, Broker, Carrier, Auditor) for the purpose of facilitating both internal and external investigations. Legally, it often implies multi-jurisdictional and multi-tenant situations.

Various process models have been developed for digital forensics, including the following eight distinctive steps and attributes:

  1. Search authority. Legal authority is required to conduct a search and/or seizure of data.
  2. Chain of custody. In legal contexts, chronological documentation of access and handling of evidentiary items is required to avoid allegations of evidence tampering or misconduct.
  3. Imaging/hashing function. When items containing potential digital evidence are found, each should be carefully duplicated and then hashed to validate the integrity of the copy.
  4. Validated tools. When possible, tools used for forensics should be validated to ensure reliability and correctness.
  5. Forensic analysis is the execution of investigative and analytical techniques to examine, analyze, and interpret the evidentiary artifacts retrieved.
  6. Repeatability and reproducibility (quality assurance). The procedures and conclusions of forensic analysis should be repeatable and reproducible by the same or other forensic analysts.
  7. Reporting. The forensic analyst must document his or her analytical procedure and conclusions for use by others.
  8. Presentation. In most cases, the forensic analyst will present his or her findings and conclusions to a court or other audience.

In order to carry out digital forensic investigations in the cloud, these steps need to be applied or adapted to the cloud context. Many of them pose significant challenges. This document is focused on the forensic analysis of artifacts retrieved from a cloud environment. A related discipline, which is not addressed here, focuses on carrying out the forensic process using a cloud environment. This involves using the cloud to perform examination and analysis of digital evidence.


Read the Complete Publication on Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges (PDF)

NISTIR 8006 – NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges – August 2020

Read more on Cloud Computing Forensics

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery

Published with permission.

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights data and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by business, information technology, and legal professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding data and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of data and legal discovery organizations. Registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world, ComplexDiscovery OÜ operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

A (Brand) New Approach? Considering the Framework and Structure of eDiscovery Offerings

Today’s eDiscovery providers may benefit from the lessons learned in the creation of the Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band album by creating a concept for branding and packaging their offerings within that brand in a connected, theme-based way that represents the offerings’ promise and capability in a way that is easy to understand and remember.

This fictionalized branding approach was developed from the intellectual exercise of trying to figure out a reasonable and memorable way to descriptively highlight the promise and capabilities of offerings typically delivered by full-service eDiscovery providers. It may not be completely comprehensive or fully normalized. However, the hope of sharing this branding example is that it might help those involved in the branding and communication of eDiscovery provider services and solutions.

eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in 2020

Since beginning to track the number of publicly highlighted merger, acquisition,...

Relativity Acquires VerQu

According to Relativity CEO Mike Gamson, "It's imperative that the legal...

eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in Q4 2020

From Nuix and DISCO to Exterro and AccessData, the following findings,...

DISCO Closes Funding Round of $100 Million

According to DISCO CEO Kiwi Camara, “Legaltech is booming now, and...

A New Era in eDiscovery? Framing Market Growth Through the Lens of Six Eras

There are many excellent resources for considering chronological and historiographical approaches...

An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2020-2025 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

While the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for worldwide eDiscovery software...

Resetting the Baseline? eDiscovery Market Size Adjustments for 2020

An unanticipated pandemeconomic-driven retraction in eDiscovery spending during 2020 has resulted...

Home or Away? New eDiscovery Collection Market Sizing and Pricing Considerations

One of the key home (onsite) or away (remote) decisions that...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for January 2021

From eDiscovery business confidence and operational metrics to merger and acquisition...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for December 2020

May the peace and joy of the holiday season be with...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for November 2020

From market sizing and cyber law to industry investments and customer...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for October 2020

From business confidence and captive ALSPs to digital republics and mass...

Only a Matter of Time? HaystackID Launches New Service for Data Breach Discovery and Review

According to HaystackID's Chief Innovation Officer and President of Global Investigations,...

It’s a Match! Focusing on the Total Cost of eDiscovery Review with ReviewRight Match

As a leader in remote legal document review, HaystackID provides clients...

From Proactive Detection to Data Breach Reviews: Sensitive Data Discovery and Extraction with Ascema

A steady rise in the number of sensitive data discovery requirements...

A Running List: Top 100+ eDiscovery Providers

Based on a compilation of research from analyst firms and industry...

Not So Outstanding? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Winter of 2021

In the winter of 2021, eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey more...

A Lifting of the Fog? Winter 2021 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey Results

This is the twenty-first quarterly eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey conducted by...

High Five? An Aggregate Overview of Five Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Surveys

As we are in the midst of a pandemic that has...

Balancing Relevance and Reality? Winter 2021 eDiscovery Pricing Survey Results

Based on the complexity of data and legal discovery, it is...