Content Assessment: A Deep Dive into Uncharted Waters: An Exploratory Analysis of Justice in a Generative AI World
Information - 95%
Insight - 96%
Relevance - 96%
Objectivity - 94%
Authority - 95%
A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit of the new paper titled "The GPT Judge: Justice in a Generative AI World" as shared by author/experts Maura Grossman, Paul W. Grimm, Daniel G. Brown, and Molly (Yiming) Xu.
Editor’s Note: From time to time, ComplexDiscovery highlights publicly available or privately purchasable announcements, content updates, and research from cyber, data, and legal discovery providers, research organizations, and ComplexDiscovery community members. While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions.
Contact us today to submit recommendations for consideration and inclusion in ComplexDiscovery’s data and legal discovery-centric service, product, or research announcements.
Background Note: In an era defined by the growing influence of artificial intelligence, distinguished experts Maura Grossman, Paul W. Grimm, Daniel G. Brown, and Molly (Yiming) Xu are at the forefront of illuminating the legal and ethical landscapes shaped by this advancement. Their forthcoming paper, “The GPTJudge: Justice in a Generative AI World,” offers a deep dive into the uncharted waters of Generative AI (GenAI) and its implications for those in the eDiscovery ecosystem. This pivotal analysis, shared with permission, is scheduled for publication in Vol. 23, Iss. 1 of Duke Law & Technology Review (October 2023).
In this new paper, the authors dive into the capabilities of state-of-the-art GenAI systems, such as ChatGPT, which have rapidly evolved to generate content strikingly similar to those created by humans. This unprecedented progress in AI technology is provoking profound challenges for litigants, attorneys, and the courts, especially concerning the authentication of AI-produced evidence. In this area, the authors suggest a potential surge in litigation expenses as parties may increasingly resort to forensic experts to examine AI-generated evidence.
With a keen eye on intellectual property law, the authors also explore the implications of GenAI crafting machine-made content. Though not human-originated, this content could potentially infringe upon human-generated content, prompting a reevaluation of current laws and practices. They further scrutinize how GenAI may alter the way legal cases are litigated and adjudicated.
Leveraging their expansive expertise and unique insights, the authors present a comprehensive and cogent overview of GenAI’s workings. They tackle the intricate evidentiary conundrums surfacing in civil and criminal trials due to genuine or purported (i.e., deepfake) GenAI output. Notably, the paper proposes practical, sequential guidelines for courts and lawyers to effectively navigate the evidentiary challenges propelled by GenAI.
This fundamental yet groundbreaking work promises to be an invaluable resource for professionals in cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery, aiding them as they begin navigating the legal and ethical quandaries of GenAI use.
Industry Expert Paper*
The GPTJudge: Justice In A Generative AI World
By Maura Grossman, Paul W. Grimm, Daniel G. Brown, and Molly (Yiming) Xu
Generative AI (“GenAI”) systems such as ChatGPT recently have developed to the point where they are capable of producing computer-generated text and images that are difficult to differentiate from human-generated text and images. Similarly, evidentiary materials such as documents, videos and audio recordings that are AI-generated are becoming increasingly difficult to differentiate from those that are not AI-generated. These technological advancements present significant challenges to parties, their counsel, and the courts in determining whether evidence is authentic or fake. Moreover, the explosive proliferation and use of GenAI applications raises concerns about whether litigation costs will dramatically increase as parties are forced to hire forensic experts to address AI-generated evidence, the ability of juries to discern authentic from fake evidence, and whether GenAI will overwhelm the courts with AI-generated lawsuits, whether vexatious or otherwise. GenAI systems have the potential to challenge existing substantive intellectual property (“IP”) law by producing content that is machine, not human, generated, but that also relies on human-generated content in potentially infringing ways. Finally, GenAI threatens to alter the way in which lawyers litigate and judges decide cases.
This article discusses these issues, and offers a comprehensive, yet understandable, explanation of what GenAI is and how it functions. It explores evidentiary issues that must be addressed by the bench and bar to determine whether actual or asserted (i.e., deepfake) GenAI output should be admitted as evidence in civil and criminal trials. Importantly, it offers practical, step-by-step recommendations for courts and attorneys to follow in meeting the evidentiary challenges posed by GenAI. Finally, it highlights additional impacts that GenAI evidence may have on the development of substantive IP law, and its potential impact on what the future may hold for litigating cases in a GenAI world.
Complete Paper: The GPTJudge: Justice In A Generative AI World – (PDF) – Mouseover to ScrollThe GPTJudge – Justice in a Generative AI World – Authors' Copy
* Shared with permission of authors.
About the Authors
Maura R. Grossman, J.D., Ph.D. and Daniel G. Brown, Ph.D., are professors, and Molly (Yiming) Xu is an undergraduate student (as well as Drs. Grossman and Brown’s research assistant) in the David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Grossman is also an adjunct professor at Osgoode Hall Law School of York University and an affiliate faculty member of the Vector Institute of Artificial Intelligence. Hon. Paul W. Grimm (ret.) is the Director of the Bolch Judicial Institute and the David F. Levi Professor of the Practice of Law at Duke Law School. Previously, he served as a District Judge (and before that as Magistrate Judge) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.
Cite: Grossman, Maura and Grimm, Paul W. and Brown, Dan and Xu, Molly, The GPTJudge: Justice in a Generative AI World (May 23, 2023). Duke Law & Technology Review, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2023, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4460184
Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies
- Managing ChatGPT in the Corporate Environment? Six Crucial Risk Factors Highlighted by Gartner
- Exploring the Inclusion of eDiscovery-Centric Resources in the Google C4 Dataset: A Highly Selective Search
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use
ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT and DALL-E2, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).
ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on ComplexDiscovery.com. By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.
Have a Request?
If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.
ComplexDiscovery is a premier online publication renowned for providing essential insights and intelligence in the realms of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery to professionals navigating these fields. As a leading source of information, the publication expertly combines original research with aggregated news to cater to a highly specialized audience. Committed to enhancing readers’ understanding of relevant topics, ComplexDiscovery stands as an impartial and comprehensive resource for exploring trends, technologies, and services associated with electronically stored information.
The driving force behind this influential publication is ComplexDiscovery OÜ, a technology marketing firm that excels in strategic planning and tactical execution for organizations operating within these sectors. Registered as a private limited company in Estonia, a global leader in digital advancements, ComplexDiscovery OÜ dedicates its primary focus to supporting the publication. The company capitalizes on its virtual presence to provide marketing consulting and services to a diverse array of clients around the world, further solidifying its reputation as a leading voice in the eDiscovery ecosystem.