Fri. Dec 2nd, 2022
    en flag
    nl flag
    et flag
    fi flag
    fr flag
    de flag
    he flag
    ja flag
    lv flag
    pl flag
    pt flag
    es flag
    uk flag

    Content Assessment: A House Half Empty? State of Corporate Litigation Report Published by Everlaw

    Information - 93%
    Insight - 94%
    Relevance - 95%
    Objectivity - 93%
    Authority - 94%



    A short percentage-based assessment of the qualitative benefit of the recently released report titled "The State of Corporate Litigation Today" by Everlaw in conjunction with the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC).

    Editor’s Note: From time to time, ComplexDiscovery highlights publicly available or privately purchasable announcements, content updates, and research from cyber, data, and legal discovery providers, research organizations, and ComplexDiscovery community members. While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions.

    To submit recommendations for consideration and inclusion in ComplexDiscovery’s cyber, data, and legal discovery-centric service, product, or research announcements, contact us today.

    Press Announcement Extract

    Technology Adoption Named Top Non-Legal Skill Needed for In-House Legal Professionals, According to New ACC Data

    With 56% of Corporate Legal Professionals Expect Tech Needs to Increase, Survey Points to an Up-and-Coming Partner for Legal Teams: The CIO

    Everlaw, the cloud-native investigation and litigation platform, published a new report today in partnership with the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC), which revealed that almost half of corporate legal professionals (47%) believe technology adoption is the top non-legal skill needed for the next generation of in-house legal professionals.

    The State of Corporate Litigation Today report was issued today at the ACC 2022 Annual Meeting, the world’s biggest gathering of in-house counsel. More than 200 in-house counsel and legal operations professionals were surveyed about their department’s approach to litigation, technology needs, criteria for selecting outside counsel and top litigation costs.

    Key findings include:

    • Moving more work in-house is the most cited litigation cost containment strategy, used by 59% of respondents, with the energy, healthcare, and insurance industries bringing work in-house at the highest rates.
    • The ability to adopt new technology is the top non-legal skill needed for the next generation of in-house legal professionals
    • Nearly half of all legal departments report spending more than $400 per hour on outside counsel, while the average cost per matter now surpasses $100,000 and almost one-third (31%) of departments reported a higher number of litigation matters.
    • Almost half (46%) report that the average length of a typical litigation matter is increasing, with the pharmaceutical and biotech, insurance, and construction industries reporting the largest increases.

    Tech is Valued and Desired In-House, Still Underutilized

    The majority (85%) said that in-house legal professionals need to understand how new technology impacts legal work, and 56% expect their department’s technology needs to increase in a year. However, a firm’s use of innovative technology was the least common selection criterion when considering outside counsel, with expertise and industry knowledge emerging as the most common. Most participants (56%) believe there needs to be stronger collaboration between the legal department and CIO, yet just 4% indicated that their legal department works the closest with their CIO.

    “In one of the more surprising findings of the survey, tech prowess ranked as the top next-gen skill for in-house counsel,” said Blake Garcia, senior director of business intelligence at ACC. “Large-scale implementation of legal technology has been slower than anticipated due to a number of factors, However, we continue to see evidence like this that legal innovation continues to gain momentum by increasing efficiencies and lowering costs – impacting law departments’ work flows and hiring practices in the years ahead.”

    It’s been proven that spending a little on technology saves a lot in the long run, yet legal professionals still aren’t implementing technology to cut costs to their full extent. Only 12% of respondents ranked leveraging technology or artificial intelligence as one of their top three methods to save money, with moving work in-house as the top cost-savings strategy on the list. However, corporate legal departments report a strong desire to expand their use of technology. Sixty-five percent of respondents report wanting to use automated redaction tools for personally-identifiable information, for example, while 39% say they would like to use legal hold, early case assessment, and concept clustering technology in their litigation workflows.

    “Moving legal work in-house is inherently a technological endeavor,” said Chuck Kellner, strategic discovery advisor at Everlaw. “And because overall costs are the primary factor used to determine whether to settle a matter, reducing costs by bringing work in-house, powered by technology, can have significant impacts on a company’s litigation posture.”

    Litigation Lengthens

    Another forcing function driving technology adoption is the increasing length of litigation matters, as 46% reported an increase in the typical litigation matter. As the amount of discoverable data skyrockets, in-house legal teams need advanced technology to help them sort through documents that once lived in filing cabinets but now encapsulate every email, Slack, text or social media message sent. Being able to move quickly can be key to both controlling costs and improving outcomes, particularly in long-running, high-stakes litigation. Class action lawsuits last the longest, according to 75% of participants who reported an average length of at least two years, with 44% indicating an average length of at least three years.

    When it comes to the type of litigation matters that legal teams face, employment and labor issues ranked  most common, followed by breach of contract. About one-quarter (27%) reported an increase in regulatory matters, and 22% stated that the number of internal investigations has increased compared to the previous year.

    Additional findings from the report include:

    • Breach of contract and employment and labor are the most common litigation matters that legal departments face
    • The most important rationale for engaging outside counsel in the first place is a firm’s expertise in addressing subject matter, jurisdictional and geographical needs (88%), followed by the ability to complement the corporate team’s capacity (50%).
    • The top risk cited was the monetary and reputational risk to the business (38%), followed by the unpredictability of litigation outcomes (18%), the unpredictability of litigation costs (18%) and personnel constraints when managing outside counsel (12%).

    Methodology: The survey questionnaire was offered through an online survey platform. Personalized survey links were sent by email to the target population, which allowed participants to save their responses and fill out the questionnaire in more than one sitting, if needed. The survey opened on June 22, 2022, and closed on July 15, 2022. We targeted ACC members located in the United States. A total of 202 in-house counsel and legal operations professionals participated in the survey.

    About ACC

    The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) is a global legal association that promotes the common professional and business interests of in-house counsel who work for corporations, associations and other organizations through informationeducationnetworking, and advocacy. With more than 45,000 members in 85 countries employed by over 10,000 organizations, ACC connects its members to the people and resources necessary for both personal and professional growth. By in-house counsel, for in-house counsel.® For more information, visit and follow ACC on LinkedInTwitter, and Facebook.

    About Everlaw

    Everlaw helps legal teams navigate the increasingly complex ediscovery landscape to chart a straighter path to the truth. Trusted by Fortune 100 corporate counsel, 91 of the Am Law 200, and all 50 state attorneys general, Everlaw’s combination of intuitive experience, advanced technology, and partnership with customers empowers organizations to tackle the most pressing technological challenges—and transform their approach to discovery and litigation in the process. Founded in 2010 and based in Oakland, Calif., Everlaw is funded by top-tier investors, including Andreessen Horowitz, CapitalG, HIG Growth Partners, K9 Ventures, Menlo Ventures, and TPG Growth.

    Read the original announcement.

    Read the Complete Report: The State of Corporate Litigation Today (PDF) – Mouseover to Scroll


    Read the original publication.

    Additional Reading

    Source: ComplexDiscovery


    Have a Request?

    If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

    ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights cyber, data, and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding cyber, data, and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

    ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of cyber, data, and legal discovery organizations. Focused primarily on supporting the ComplexDiscovery publication, the company is registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world. The company operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

    Beyond the Perimeter? The DoD Zero Trust Strategy and Roadmap

    Current and future cyber threats and attacks drive the need for...

    Balancing Spend and Standards? Cybersecurity Investments in the European Union

    According to EU Agency for Cybersecurity Executive Director Juhan Lepassaar, “The...

    Stricter Supervisory and Enforcement Measures? European Parliament Adopts New Cybersecurity Law

    According to European Member of Parliament (MEP) Bart Groothuis, “Ransomware and...

    Geopolitical Shakedowns? The Annual ENISA Threat Landscape Report – 10th Edition

    According to EU Agency for Cybersecurity Executive Director Juhan Lepassaar, “Today's...

    A Technology-Driven Solution? Integreon Announces New Chief Executive Officer

    Subroto’s people-first leadership style combined with his passion for leveraging technology...

    A Magnet for Revenue? Magnet Forensics Announces 2022 Third Quarter Results

    According to Adam Belsher, Magnet Forensics' CEO, "Our solutions address the...

    Progress and Opportunity? Cellebrite Announces Third Quarter 2022 Results

    “We are pleased to report a solid third quarter, delivering strong...

    Fueling Continued Growth? Renovus Capital Acquires Advisory Business from HBR Consulting

    "The legal industry remains in the early stages of digital and...

    An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2022-2027 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

    From retraction to resurgence and acceleration, the worldwide market for eDiscovery...

    On the Move? 2022 eDiscovery Market Kinetics: Five Areas of Interest

    Recently ComplexDiscovery was provided an opportunity to share with the eDiscovery...

    Trusting the Process? 2021 eDiscovery Processing Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    The Year in Review? 2021 eDiscovery Review Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for November 2022

    From cyber shakedowns and threats to the total cost of eDiscovery...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for October 2022

    From cyber claims and data privacy to corporate litigation and the...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for September 2022

    From privacy legislation and special masters to acquisitions and investigations, the...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for August 2022

    From AI and Big Data challenges to intriguing financial and investment...

    Onsite or Remote? Document Reviewer Preferences Survey (Winter 2023)

    Today CompexDiscovery expands that survey portfolio by introducing a new business...

    In The House? The Fall 2022 eDiscovery Total Cost of Ownership Survey – Final Results

    Today CompexDiscovery shares the results of a new business survey focused...

    Cold Front Concerns? Eighteen Observations on eDiscovery Business Confidence in the Fall of 2022

    In the fall of 2022, 49.0% of survey respondents felt that...

    Stereotyping Data? Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Fall 2022 Overview

    In the fall of 2022, 28.0% of respondents viewed increasing types...

    The Arrival of General Winter? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 21-27, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Digging Out and Digging In? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 14-20, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    A Liberating Momentum? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 7-13, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Rhetoric or Reality? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 1-6, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...