Fri. Dec 2nd, 2022
    en flag
    nl flag
    fr flag
    de flag
    pt flag
    es flag

    What Blockchain Means for Digital Evidence Sharing, Security, and Verification

    An extract from an article by Ariel Watson as published by Cellebrite

    Although blockchain innovation has garnered mixed reviews due to the volatility of the cryptocurrency Bitcoin, it is important to separate the success of the blockchain technology, from the downsides of the Bitcoin application. The underlying blockchain distributed ledger technology (DLT) could prove to be the missing solution for managing digital assets, including digital evidence shared and validated between case stakeholders and agencies around the globe.

    Evolving consumer technology continues to challenge investigations that need to validate the origin, integrity and authenticity of digital evidence. Blockchain delivers encrypted, immutable and secure digital record asset creation and management.

    So, what exactly is blockchain technology?

    A blockchain algorithm encodes data, referred to as a “block”, and permits updates to a historical record, in the form of a “chain”. This is sustained by a distributed ledger that is shared among its system’s participants. All blockchain system users become nodes of the distributed ledger that ensures integrity of data by leveraging all computers on the peer-to-peer network. The blockchain is structured this way in order to maintain the integrity of historical data, correct inconsistencies and detect tampering.

    As a self-correcting storage system for digital records, blockchain has demonstrated data security that meets the standards of many modern-day laws. The validity of this innovative technology has prompted institutions in the US, and around the world, to amend or create laws that legitimize blockchain digital asset records in court and during governmental proceedings.

    Transparency of how digital evidence is produced, accessed or modified (including attribution of stakeholders) would greatly enhance the reliability of the digital evidence chain-of-custody. Blockchain delivers this transparency by offering untrusted parties a method of accepted evidence authentication, whereby the digital transaction history is verifiable without a third-party intermediary.

    For example, up to this point, in order to authenticate digital evidence, prosecutors and court administrators have had to rely upon third-party notary organizations to validate digital assets. Avoiding this form of “middle man” would significantly speed up case proceedings while lowering administrative costs.

    Let’s take a look at the recent adoption of blockchain DLT in the US, China, and the UK.

    Read the complete article at What Blockchain Means for Digital Evidence Sharing, Security, and Verification

    Additional Reading

    Source: ComplexDiscovery

     

    Have a Request?

    If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know and we will make our response to you a priority.

    ComplexDiscovery is an online publication that highlights cyber, data, and legal discovery insight and intelligence ranging from original research to aggregated news for use by cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals. The highly targeted publication seeks to increase the collective understanding of readers regarding cyber, data, and legal discovery information and issues and to provide an objective resource for considering trends, technologies, and services related to electronically stored information.

    ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a technology marketing firm providing strategic planning and tactical execution expertise in support of cyber, data, and legal discovery organizations. Focused primarily on supporting the ComplexDiscovery publication, the company is registered as a private limited company in the European Union country of Estonia, one of the most digitally advanced countries in the world. The company operates virtually worldwide to deliver marketing consulting and services.

    Beyond the Perimeter? The DoD Zero Trust Strategy and Roadmap

    Current and future cyber threats and attacks drive the need for...

    Balancing Spend and Standards? Cybersecurity Investments in the European Union

    According to EU Agency for Cybersecurity Executive Director Juhan Lepassaar, “The...

    Stricter Supervisory and Enforcement Measures? European Parliament Adopts New Cybersecurity Law

    According to European Member of Parliament (MEP) Bart Groothuis, “Ransomware and...

    Geopolitical Shakedowns? The Annual ENISA Threat Landscape Report – 10th Edition

    According to EU Agency for Cybersecurity Executive Director Juhan Lepassaar, “Today's...

    A Technology-Driven Solution? Integreon Announces New Chief Executive Officer

    Subroto’s people-first leadership style combined with his passion for leveraging technology...

    A Magnet for Revenue? Magnet Forensics Announces 2022 Third Quarter Results

    According to Adam Belsher, Magnet Forensics' CEO, "Our solutions address the...

    Progress and Opportunity? Cellebrite Announces Third Quarter 2022 Results

    “We are pleased to report a solid third quarter, delivering strong...

    Fueling Continued Growth? Renovus Capital Acquires Advisory Business from HBR Consulting

    "The legal industry remains in the early stages of digital and...

    An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2022-2027 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

    From retraction to resurgence and acceleration, the worldwide market for eDiscovery...

    On the Move? 2022 eDiscovery Market Kinetics: Five Areas of Interest

    Recently ComplexDiscovery was provided an opportunity to share with the eDiscovery...

    Trusting the Process? 2021 eDiscovery Processing Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    The Year in Review? 2021 eDiscovery Review Task, Spend, and Cost Data Points

    Based on the complexity of cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery,...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for November 2022

    From cyber shakedowns and threats to the total cost of eDiscovery...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for October 2022

    From cyber claims and data privacy to corporate litigation and the...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for September 2022

    From privacy legislation and special masters to acquisitions and investigations, the...

    Five Great Reads on Cyber, Data, and Legal Discovery for August 2022

    From AI and Big Data challenges to intriguing financial and investment...

    Onsite or Remote? Document Reviewer Preferences Survey (Winter 2023)

    Today CompexDiscovery expands that survey portfolio by introducing a new business...

    In The House? The Fall 2022 eDiscovery Total Cost of Ownership Survey – Final Results

    Today CompexDiscovery shares the results of a new business survey focused...

    Cold Front Concerns? Eighteen Observations on eDiscovery Business Confidence in the Fall of 2022

    In the fall of 2022, 49.0% of survey respondents felt that...

    Stereotyping Data? Issues Impacting eDiscovery Business Performance: A Fall 2022 Overview

    In the fall of 2022, 28.0% of respondents viewed increasing types...

    The Arrival of General Winter? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 21-27, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Digging Out and Digging In? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 14-20, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    A Liberating Momentum? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 7-13, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...

    Rhetoric or Reality? Ukraine Conflict Assessments in Maps (November 1-6, 2022)

    According to a recent update from the Institute for the Study...