Considering Fourth Generation eDiscovery Technology Offerings: Two Approaches (Part Two)

In looking beyond an offering’s general design focus, integration, and automation, it is important to understand specific technology differentiation in order to truly compare offerings.


Author’s Note: Expanding on the original article, Considering Third Generation Discovery? Two Approaches for Evaluating eDiscovery Offerings1, this update comprehends the expansion of design focus, capabilities, and flexibility for eDiscovery technology offerings since 2009. This is part two of a two-part update. Click here for part one.

Beyond Design Focus, Integration, and Automation

In looking beyond an offering’s general design focus, integration, and automation, it is important to understand specific technology differentiation in order to truly compare offerings. While there are many ways to compare and contrast specific offerings, the following questions pertaining to a technology offering’s capability, flexibility, delivery method, pricing model, and security approach may be helpful in understanding offering differences.

What are a technology offering’s capabilities?2

Does the offering help address planning requirements for eDiscovery?

  • Legal Hold Readiness
  • Triggering Event Management
  • Legal Hold Process
  • Information Governance
  • Litigation Readiness

Does the offering help address preservation requirements for eDiscovery?

  • Identification
  • Preservation
  • Collection
  • Hold Notices
  • Interviews

Does the offering help address preparation requirements for eDiscovery?

  • Filtering
  • Converting
  • Processing
  • Cooperating

Does the offering help address review requirements for eDiscovery?

  • Review
  • Analysis
  • Culling
  • Computer-Assisted Review
  • Protections

Does the offering help address sharing requirements for eDiscovery?

  • Disclosure
  • Form of Forms
  • Presentation
  • Production
  • Evidence

How flexible is the technology offering in integrating and automating eDiscovery tasks?

  • Does the offering support task integration within a single platform?
  • Does the offering support task to task automation within a single platform?
  • Does the offering support task integration with other eDiscovery offerings?
  • Does the offering support task to task automation with other eDiscovery offerings?

What is the technology offering’s delivery model?

  • Is the offering delivered as software for installation on organizational hardware?
  • Is the offering delivered as an appliance (hardware/software/firmware?
  • Is the offering delivered as Software as a Service (SaaS)?
  • Is the offering delivered as a managed service?

What is the technology offering’s pricing model?

  • Does the offering require purchasing of hardware, software, and/or an appliance?
  • Does the offering require payment for licensing and/or maintenance?
  • Does the offering require payment for usage via a subscription?
  • Does the offering require payment for usage by users, time, and volume?

What is the technology offering’s security approach?

  • Is the offering deployed and maintained on-premises?
  • Is the offering deployed and maintained off-premises as part of the public cloud?
  • Is the offering deployed and maintained off-premises as part of a private cloud?
  • Is the offering deployed and maintained off-premises as part of a protected cloud ( a hybrid of public and private cloud approaches)?

Taking the understanding of an offering developed through consideration of the previous questions, one can then begin to compare and contrast eDiscovery technology offerings through the use of a simple generation model of eDiscovery Classification.

Tying It All Together: The Generational Model of eDiscovery Technology Offerings

In looking at a technology offering’s design focus, integration approach, automation approach as well as being able to determine the offering’s capability, flexibility, delivery model, pricing model, and security approach, one can visually compare and contrast different technology offerings using the Generational Model of eDiscovery Technology Offering Classification (Figure 3).

Figure 3 – Generational Model of eDiscovery Technology

This model portrays in a general fashion where most generational offerings fall in relation to capability, flexibility, delivery method, affordability, and security.

Hopefully, with the considerations provided in the complete offering and generational model approaches shared in this two-part update, legal and information technology professionals will have some new and useful tools they can use as they seek to consider and compare eDiscovery technologies.

Click here for part one of this two-part update.

1 Robinson, W. R. (2009). Considering Third Generation eDiscovery? Two Approaches for Evaluating eDiscovery Offerings. Austin, TX: Orange Legal Technologies.

2 A Basic eDiscovery Framework: One Way To Align Three Differing Approaches. (2012, November 30). Retrieved from http://www.complexdiscovery.com/info/2012/11/30/a-basic-ediscovery-framework-one-way-to-align-three-differing-approaches/

 

A Matter of Pricing? A Running Update of Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Survey Responses

First administered in December of 2018 and conducted four times during the last two years with 334 individual responses, the semi-annual eDiscovery Pricing Survey highlights pricing on selected collection, processing, and review tasks. The aggregate results of all surveys as shared in the provided comparative charts may be helpful for understanding pricing and its impact on purchasing behavior on selected services over time.



Access the Results Now!

ComplexDiscovery combines original industry research with curated expert articles to create an informational resource that helps legal, business, and information technology professionals better understand the business and practice of data discovery and legal discovery.

All contributions are invested to support the development and distribution of ComplexDiscovery content. Contributors can make as many article contributions as they like, but will not be asked to register and pay until their contribution reaches $5.

A Cybersecurity Self Check? Medical Facilities Best Practice Test Criteria for Article 32 GDPR

According to the publishers, this paper is an aid to quickly...

Classifications, Concerns, and Concepts: Reference Architectures and the Industrial Internet of Things

The expected disruptive developments collectively referred to as the Internet of...

A Matter of Pricing? A Running Update of Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Survey Responses

First administered in December of 2018 and conducted four times during...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for May 2020

From review market sizing revisions to pandemeconomic pricing, the May 2020...

A Running List: Top 100+ eDiscovery Providers

Based on a compilation of research from analyst firms and industry...

The eDisclosure Systems Buyers Guide – 2020 Edition (Andrew Haslam)

Authored by industry expert Andrew Haslam, the eDisclosure Buyers Guide continues...

The Race to the Starting Line? Recent Secure Remote Review Announcements

Not all secure remote review offerings are equal as the apparent...

Enabling Remote eDiscovery? A Snapshot of DaaS

Desktop as a Service (DaaS) providers are becoming important contributors to...

Revisions and Decisions? New Considerations for eDiscovery Secure Remote Reviews

One of the key revision and decision areas that business, legal,...

A Macro Look at Past and Projected eDiscovery Market Size from 2012 to 2024

From a macro look at past estimations of eDiscovery market size...

An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2019-2024 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

While the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for worldwide eDiscovery software...

An eDiscovery Market Size Mashup: 2018-2023 Worldwide Software and Services Overview

The annual eDiscovery Market Size Mashup estimates the combined worldwide eDiscovery...

A Matter of Pricing? A Running Update of Semi-Annual eDiscovery Pricing Survey Responses

First administered in December of 2018 and conducted four times during...

A Pandemeconomic Indicator? Summer 2020 eDiscovery Pricing Survey Results

Based on the complexity of data and legal discovery, it is...

COVID-19 Constrained? The Impact of Six Issues on the Business of eDiscovery

In the spring of 2020, 51.2% of respondents viewed budgetary constraints...

A Cause to Pause? eDiscovery Operational Metrics in the Spring of 2020

In the spring of 2020, 150 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey participants...

eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments in Q1 2020

From HaystackID and Everlaw to Cellebrite and Carbonite, ComplexDiscovery findings, data...

eDiscovery Technology Provider Everlaw Raises $62M

"Everlaw is changing the way legal teams uncover the truth buried...

OpenText Buys Secure Information Exchange and Unified Communications Leader XMedius

“We welcome XMedius’s customers, strong partner network and employees to OpenText,"...

TCDI Receives Private Equity Investment from Trivest Partners

“We are excited to partner with TCDI and Bill Johnson to...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for May 2020

From review market sizing revisions to pandemeconomic pricing, the May 2020...

Five Great Reads on eDiscovery for April 2020

From business confidence to the boom of Zoom, the April 2020...

Five Great Reads on Data Discovery and Legal Discovery for March 2020

From business continuity considerations to cybersecurity attacks, the March 2020 edition...

Five Great Reads on Data Discovery and Legal Discovery for February 2020

From cyber operations to pricing data points on eDiscovery, the February...