Fri. Apr 19th, 2024
ARCHIVED CONTENT
You are viewing ARCHIVED CONTENT released online between 1 April 2010 and 24 August 2018 or content that has been selectively archived and is no longer active. Content in this archive is NOT UPDATED, and links may not function.
 


Editor’s Note: Published by Bill Dimm of Hot Neuron, the paper Confirming Recall Adequacy With Unbiased Multi-Stage Acceptance Testing and a link to a brief overview of the paper describe a new method for requiring much less document review to demonstrate adequate recall achievement in eDiscovery. The paper will be presented by Mr. Dimm as part of the DESI VII Workshop in London, UK.

Confirming Recall Adequacy: A New Approach

Abstract and Complete Paper by Bill Dimm

The adequacy of an e-discovery production has traditionally been established by using random sampling to estimate recall, but that requires review of approximately 400/ρ documents, where ρ is the prevalence, which can be burdensome when prevalence is low. Accept-on-zero testing is sometimes suggested as an option requiring less review at only about 12/ρ, but in practice, it is biased and is likely to fail when recall actually is adequate. This paper proposes a multi-stage acceptance testing procedure that avoids bias and actually works in practice. The amount of document review required with the new method depends on the level of recall actually achieved. It is typically around 200/ρ or 100/ρ, but can be as low as 25/ρ if the actual recall is substantially higher than the minimum required. This dependence on the recall achieved may motivate producing parties to aim for higher recall since the additional document review put into pushing recall higher will be at least partially offset set by a reduction in review effort needed to confirm the adequacy of the result.

The Complete Paper (Bill Dimm/Hot Neuron LLC)

WD

Read the complete explanation of the article at Substantial Reduction in Review Effort Required to Demonstrate Adequate Recall

Source: Dimm, William. Confirming Recall Adequacy With Unbiased Multi-Stage Acceptance Testing. London, UK: Bill Dimm, Hot Neuron, LLC, 2017. Web. 6 June 2017. ICAIL 2017 DESI VII Workshop.

Additional Reading

 

Have a Request?

If you have information or offering requests that you would like to ask us about, please let us know, and we will make our response to you a priority.

ComplexDiscovery OÜ is a highly recognized digital publication focused on providing detailed insights into the fields of cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery. Based in Estonia, a hub for digital innovation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ upholds rigorous standards in journalistic integrity, delivering nuanced analyses of global trends, technology advancements, and the eDiscovery sector. The publication expertly connects intricate legal technology issues with the broader narrative of international business and current events, offering its readership invaluable insights for informed decision-making.

For the latest in law, technology, and business, visit ComplexDiscovery.com.

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Model Use

ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the value of GAI and LLM tools in streamlining content creation processes and enhancing the overall quality of its research, writing, and editing efforts. To this end, ComplexDiscovery OÜ regularly employs GAI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, and DALL-E, to assist, augment, and accelerate the development and publication of both new and revised content in posts and pages published (initiated in late 2022).

ComplexDiscovery also provides a ChatGPT-powered AI article assistant for its users. This feature leverages LLM capabilities to generate relevant and valuable insights related to specific page and post content published on ComplexDiscovery.com. By offering this AI-driven service, ComplexDiscovery OÜ aims to create a more interactive and engaging experience for its users, while highlighting the importance of responsible and ethical use of GAI and LLM technologies.