TAR for Smart Chickens

Special Master Maura Grossman recently issued an Order crafting a new validation protocol In Re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation, (Jan. 3, 2018), which is currently pending in the Northern District of Illinois.

Extract from article by John Tradennick and Jeremy Pickens

Validation is one of the more challenging parts of technology-assisted review. We have written about it— and the attendant difficulty of proving recall—several times:

The fundamental question is whether a party using TAR has found a sufficient number of responsive documents to meet its discovery obligations. For reasons discussed in our earlier articles, proving that you have attained a sufficient level of recall to justify stopping the review can be a difficult problem, particularly when richness is low.

Special Master Maura Grossman recently issued an Order crafting a new validation protocol In Re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation, (Jan. 3, 2018), which is currently pending in the Northern District of Illinois. You can download a copy to the Order here.

While the Order was issued in the context of what seems to be document intensive litigation, the validation method it offers is important because it could work for other matters, whether the review is based on TAR 1.0, TAR 2.0 or even a simple linear review.

Additional Reading:

ComplexDiscovery combines original industry research with curated expert articles to create an informational resource that helps legal, business, and information technology professionals better understand the business and practice of data discovery and legal discovery.

All contributions are invested to support the development and distribution of ComplexDiscovery content. Contributors can make as many article contributions as they like, but will not be asked to register and pay until their contribution reaches $5.